From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752488AbaFARmJ (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Jun 2014 13:42:09 -0400 Received: from violet.fr.zoreil.com ([92.243.8.30]:41150 "EHLO violet.fr.zoreil.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751740AbaFARmH (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Jun 2014 13:42:07 -0400 Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2014 19:42:05 +0200 From: Francois Romieu To: Udo van den Heuvel Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: 3.14.1 network issue with rtl81xx chip Message-ID: <20140601174205.GA2027@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> References: <538B2502.5070707@xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <538B2502.5070707@xs4all.nl> X-Organisation: Land of Sunshine Inc. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Udo van den Heuvel : [...] > On two boxes with rtl network chip I see connections going down. Do you notice netdev watchdog messages in the kernel log ? [...] > 3.14.1 has the issue. Does it qualify as a (recent ?) regression or is it a fresh new setup ? > How can I fix this more elegantly ? No suggestion yet. -- Ueimor