From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>,
Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd.bergmann@linaro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, patches@linaro.org,
linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ARM: add get_user() support for 8 byte types
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 14:36:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140617133620.GJ23430@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53A0428C.10200@linaro.org>
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 02:28:44PM +0100, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> On 17/06/14 12:09, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 11:17:23AM +0100, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> >> ... at this point there is a narrowing cast followed by an implicit
> >> widening. This results in compiler either ignoring r3 altogether or, if
> >> spilling to the stack, generating code to set r3 to zero before doing
> >> the store.
> >
> > In actual fact, there's very little difference between the two
> > implementations in terms of generated code.
> >
> > The difference between them is what happens on the 64-bit big endian
> > narrowing case, where we use __get_user_4 with your version. This
> > adds one additional instruction.
>
> Good point.
>
>
> > and 64-bit narrowed to 32-bit:
> >
> > str lr, [sp, #-4]!
> > - mov ip, r0
> > + mov r3, r0
> > mov r0, r1
> > #APP
> > @ 275 "t-getuser.c" 1
> > - bl __get_user_8
> > + bl __get_user_4
> > @ 0 "" 2
> > - str r2, [ip, #0]
> > + str r2, [r3, #0]
> > ldr pc, [sp], #4
>
> The later case avoids allocating r3 for the __get_user_x and should
> reduce register pressure and, potentially, saves a few instructions
> elsewhere (one of my rather large test functions does demonstrate this
> effect).
>
> I don't know if we care about that. If we do I'm certainly happy to put
> a patch together than exploits this (whilst avoiding the add in the big
> endian case).
No need - the + case is your version, the - case is my version. So your
version wins on this point. :)
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: now at 9.7Mbps down 460kbps up... slowly
improving, and getting towards what was expected from it.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-17 13:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-12 15:42 Daniel Thompson
2014-06-12 15:58 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-06-17 10:17 ` Daniel Thompson
2014-06-17 11:09 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-06-17 13:28 ` Daniel Thompson
2014-06-17 13:36 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2014-06-17 13:54 ` Daniel Thompson
2014-06-12 17:04 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-06-20 10:01 ` [PATCH v4] " Daniel Thompson
2014-07-10 19:47 ` [PATCH 3.16.0-rc3-rmk v5] " Daniel Thompson
2014-08-21 5:36 ` Victor Kamensky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140617133620.GJ23430@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=arnd.bergmann@linaro.org \
--cc=daniel.thompson@linaro.org \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
--cc=patches@linaro.org \
--cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome