From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1757060AbaFSBt0 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 18 Jun 2014 21:49:26 -0400
Received: from mail-qg0-f49.google.com ([209.85.192.49]:44466 "EHLO
	mail-qg0-f49.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1756638AbaFSBtY (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 18 Jun 2014 21:49:24 -0400
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 21:49:20 -0400
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@unimore.it>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>,
        Fabio Checconi <fchecconi@gmail.com>,
        Arianna Avanzini <avanzini.arianna@gmail.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org,
        cgroups@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC - TAKE TWO - 00/12] New version of the BFQ I/O
 Scheduler
Message-ID: <20140619014920.GB20100@mtj.dyndns.org>
References: <20140528221929.GG1419@htj.dyndns.org>
 <1401354343-5527-1-git-send-email-paolo.valente@unimore.it>
 <20140530160712.GG24871@htj.dyndns.org>
 <538926F6.7080409@kernel.dk>
 <20140531051635.GA19925@mtj.dyndns.org>
 <538C8A47.1050502@kernel.dk>
 <0A5218F8-0215-4B4F-959B-EE5AAEFC164A@unimore.it>
 <20140619014600.GA20100@mtj.dyndns.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20140619014600.GA20100@mtj.dyndns.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 09:46:00PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
...
> So, the perfectly smooth and performant transformation is possible,
     ^
     if
> it'd be great, but I don't really think that'd be the case.  My

-- 
tejun