From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.linux@gmail.com>,
Shiraz Hashim <shiraz.linux.kernel@gmail.com>,
spear-devel@list.st.com
Subject: [patch 09/13] irqchip: spear_shirq: Kill the clear_reg nonsense
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 21:34:41 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140619212713.570396433@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140619212606.431750473@linutronix.de>
[-- Attachment #1: spear-shirq-kill-clear-reg-nonsense.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3610 bytes --]
None of the chips has a ACK register. The code brainlessly fiddles
with the enable register, so it might even reenable a disabled
interrupt at least on spear300.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
drivers/irqchip/spear-shirq.c | 35 +----------------------------------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 34 deletions(-)
Index: linux/drivers/irqchip/spear-shirq.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/drivers/irqchip/spear-shirq.c
+++ linux/drivers/irqchip/spear-shirq.c
@@ -33,15 +33,11 @@
* reset_to_enb: val 1 indicates, we need to clear bit for enabling interrupt
* status_reg: status register offset
* status_reg_mask: status register valid mask
- * clear_reg: clear register offset
- * reset_to_clear: val 1 indicates, we need to clear bit for clearing interrupt
*/
struct shirq_regs {
u32 enb_reg;
u32 reset_to_enb;
u32 status_reg;
- u32 clear_reg;
- u32 reset_to_clear;
};
/*
@@ -78,7 +74,6 @@ static struct spear_shirq spear300_shirq
.regs = {
.enb_reg = SPEAR300_INT_ENB_MASK_REG,
.status_reg = SPEAR300_INT_STS_MASK_REG,
- .clear_reg = -1,
},
};
@@ -96,7 +91,6 @@ static struct spear_shirq spear310_shirq
.regs = {
.enb_reg = -1,
.status_reg = SPEAR310_INT_STS_MASK_REG,
- .clear_reg = -1,
},
};
@@ -107,7 +101,6 @@ static struct spear_shirq spear310_shirq
.regs = {
.enb_reg = -1,
.status_reg = SPEAR310_INT_STS_MASK_REG,
- .clear_reg = -1,
},
};
@@ -118,7 +111,6 @@ static struct spear_shirq spear310_shirq
.regs = {
.enb_reg = -1,
.status_reg = SPEAR310_INT_STS_MASK_REG,
- .clear_reg = -1,
},
};
@@ -129,7 +121,6 @@ static struct spear_shirq spear310_shirq
.regs = {
.enb_reg = -1,
.status_reg = SPEAR310_INT_STS_MASK_REG,
- .clear_reg = -1,
},
};
@@ -150,13 +141,6 @@ static struct spear_shirq spear320_shirq
.nr_irqs = 7,
.mask = ((0x1 << 7) - 1) << 0,
.disabled = 1,
- .regs = {
- .enb_reg = SPEAR320_INT_ENB_MASK_REG,
- .reset_to_enb = 1,
- .status_reg = SPEAR320_INT_STS_MASK_REG,
- .clear_reg = SPEAR320_INT_CLR_MASK_REG,
- .reset_to_clear = 1,
- },
};
static struct spear_shirq spear320_shirq_ras1 = {
@@ -166,8 +150,6 @@ static struct spear_shirq spear320_shirq
.regs = {
.enb_reg = -1,
.status_reg = SPEAR320_INT_STS_MASK_REG,
- .clear_reg = SPEAR320_INT_CLR_MASK_REG,
- .reset_to_clear = 1,
},
};
@@ -178,8 +160,6 @@ static struct spear_shirq spear320_shirq
.regs = {
.enb_reg = -1,
.status_reg = SPEAR320_INT_STS_MASK_REG,
- .clear_reg = SPEAR320_INT_CLR_MASK_REG,
- .reset_to_clear = 1,
},
};
@@ -190,8 +170,6 @@ static struct spear_shirq spear320_shirq
.regs = {
.enb_reg = -1,
.status_reg = SPEAR320_INT_STS_MASK_REG,
- .clear_reg = SPEAR320_INT_CLR_MASK_REG,
- .reset_to_clear = 1,
},
};
@@ -246,7 +224,7 @@ static void shirq_handler(unsigned irq,
struct spear_shirq *shirq = irq_get_handler_data(irq);
struct irq_data *idata = irq_desc_get_irq_data(desc);
struct irq_chip *chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip(idata);
- u32 i, j, val, mask, tmp;
+ u32 i, j, val, mask;
chip->irq_ack(idata);
@@ -261,17 +239,6 @@ static void shirq_handler(unsigned irq,
continue;
generic_handle_irq(shirq->virq_base + i);
-
- /* clear interrupt */
- if (shirq->regs.clear_reg == -1)
- continue;
-
- tmp = readl(shirq->base + shirq->regs.clear_reg);
- if (shirq->regs.reset_to_clear)
- tmp &= ~(j << shirq->offset);
- else
- tmp |= (j << shirq->offset);
- writel(tmp, shirq->base + shirq->regs.clear_reg);
}
}
chip->irq_unmask(idata);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-19 21:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-19 21:34 [patch 00/13] irqchip: spear_shirq: Cleanup the bitrot Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-19 21:34 ` [patch 02/13] irqchip: spear_shirq: Kill pointless static Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-19 21:34 ` [patch 01/13] irqchip: spear_shirq: Fix interrupt offset Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-21 23:30 ` Jason Cooper
2014-06-19 21:34 ` [patch 03/13] irqchip: spear_shirq: Move private structs to source Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-19 21:34 ` [patch 04/13] irqchip: spear_shirq: No point in storing the parent irq Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-19 21:34 ` [patch 05/13] irqchip: spear_shirq: Namespace cleanup Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-19 21:34 ` [patch 06/13] irqchip: spear_shirq: Reorder the spear320 ras blocks Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-19 21:34 ` [patch 07/13] irqchip: spear_shirq: Use the proper interfaces Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-19 21:34 ` [patch 08/13] irqchip: spear_shirq: Precalculate status mask Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-20 7:19 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-06-20 8:06 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-20 8:19 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-06-19 21:34 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2014-06-20 7:05 ` [patch 09/13] irqchip: spear_shirq: Kill the clear_reg nonsense Viresh Kumar
2014-06-20 8:00 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-19 21:34 ` [patch 10/13] irqchip: spear_shirq: Simplify chained handler Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-19 21:34 ` [patch 12/13] irqchip: spear_shirq: Use proper irq chips for the different SoCs Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-19 21:34 ` [patch 11/13] irqchip: spear_shirq: Remove the parent irq "ack"/unmask Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-19 21:34 ` [patch 13/13] irqchip: spear_shirq: Simplify register access code Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-20 7:09 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-06-20 8:05 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-06-20 8:24 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-06-20 9:20 ` [patch 00/13] irqchip: spear_shirq: Cleanup the bitrot Viresh Kumar
2014-06-23 8:25 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-06-24 12:45 ` Jason Cooper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140619212713.570396433@linutronix.de \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shiraz.linux.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=spear-devel@list.st.com \
--cc=viresh.linux@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®