mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
	Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Dave Anderson <anderson@redhat.com>,
	Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/3] trace_seq: Move the trace_seq code to lib/
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 12:21:35 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140620122135.17a90bfb@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFx_BVK6EvMTcTy218coYEhvMdw3AkygDtiZk5aHxa-fuA@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, 19 Jun 2014 18:45:57 -1000
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 11:33 AM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> > From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> >
> > The trace_seq functions are rather useful outside of tracing.
> 
> They are?

They will be.

> Why and where?

Why? for NMI safe output.

Where? Well, in patch 3. :-)

> And why are they still called "trace_xyz()" then?

Good point, I'd like to rename it too. It was designed like seq_file,
so what about seq_buffer_xxx()?


> 
> That commit message is useless and contains no actual information.

Yeah, it was rather weak. It was quick and not a stand alone. It was
dependent on reading the rest of the patches.

OK, I can update the name and make a better change log on the move.

Of course if you hate this patch series, I can just not waste any time
on it.

-- Steve


  reply	other threads:[~2014-06-20 16:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-19 21:33 [RFC][PATCH 0/3] x86/nmi: Print all cpu stacks from NMI safely Steven Rostedt
2014-06-19 21:33 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/3] trace_seq: Move the trace_seq code to lib/ Steven Rostedt
2014-06-20  4:45   ` Linus Torvalds
2014-06-20 16:21     ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2014-06-20  5:06   ` Andrew Morton
2014-06-20 16:58     ` Steven Rostedt
2014-06-20 17:12       ` Andrew Morton
2014-06-20 17:17         ` Steven Rostedt
2014-06-20 20:28         ` Steven Rostedt
2014-06-20 20:51           ` Steven Rostedt
2014-06-23 16:33             ` Petr Mládek
2014-06-23 17:03               ` Steven Rostedt
2014-06-22  7:38       ` Johannes Berg
2014-06-23 16:08         ` Steven Rostedt
2014-06-23 17:38           ` Johannes Berg
2014-06-23 18:04             ` Steven Rostedt
2014-06-24  8:19               ` Johannes Berg
2014-06-19 21:33 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/3] printk: Add per_cpu printk func to allow printk to be diverted Steven Rostedt
2014-06-23 16:06   ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-06-19 21:33 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/3] x86/nmi: Perform a safe NMI stack trace on all CPUs Steven Rostedt
2014-06-20 13:58   ` Don Zickus
2014-06-20 14:21     ` Steven Rostedt
2014-06-20 14:55   ` Petr Mládek
2014-06-20 15:17     ` Steven Rostedt
2014-06-23 16:12   ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-06-19 21:56 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/3] x86/nmi: Print all cpu stacks from NMI safely Jiri Kosina
2014-06-19 22:58   ` Steven Rostedt
2014-06-19 23:03     ` Jiri Kosina
2014-06-19 23:19       ` Steven Rostedt
2014-06-19 23:27         ` Jiri Kosina
2014-06-19 23:36           ` Steven Rostedt
2014-06-19 23:38             ` Jiri Kosina
2014-06-20 14:35               ` Petr Mládek
2014-06-24 13:32                 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2014-06-25 10:01                   ` Jiri Kosina
2014-06-25 11:04                     ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2014-06-25 11:57                       ` Petr Mládek
2014-06-25 12:21                   ` Petr Mládek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140620122135.17a90bfb@gandalf.local.home \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anderson@redhat.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.cz \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®