mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Cgroups <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] cgroup: fix a race between cgroup_mount() and cgroup_kill_sb()
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 11:00:53 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140625150053.GE26883@htj.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53AA2C4F.30808@huawei.com>

Hey,

On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 09:56:31AM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
> > Hmmm?  Why does that matter?  The only region in cgroup_mount() which
> > needs to be put inside such mutex would be root lookup, no?
> 
> unfortunately that won't help. I think what you suggest is:
> 
> cgroup_mount()
> {
> 	mutex_lock();
> 	lookup_cgroup_root();
> 	mutex_unlock();
> 	kernfs_mount();
> }
> 
> cgroup_kill_sb()
> {
> 	mutex_lock();
> 	percpu_ref_kill();
> 	mutex_Unlock();
> 	kernfs_kill_sb();
> }
> 
> See, we may still be destroying the superblock after we've succeeded
> in getting the refcnt of cgroup root.

Sure, but now the decision to kill is synchronized so the other side
can interlock with it.  e.g.

cgroup_mount()
{
	mutex_lock();
	lookup_cgroup_root();
	if (root isn't killed yet)
		root->this_better_stay_alive++;
	mutex_unlock();
	kernfs_mount();
}

cgroup_kill_sb()
{
	mutex_lock();
	if (check whether root can be killed)
		percpu_ref_kill();
	mutex_unlock();
	if (the above condition was true)
		kernfs_kill_sb();
}

-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2014-06-25 15:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-12  6:31 [PATCH 1/5] cgroup: fix broken css_has_online_children() Li Zefan
2014-06-12  6:31 ` [PATCH 2/5] percpu-ref: introduce percpu_ref_alive() Li Zefan
2014-06-12  6:32 ` [PATCH 3/5] cgroup: fix mount failure in a corner case Li Zefan
2014-06-20 19:10   ` Tejun Heo
2014-06-24  1:15     ` Li Zefan
2014-06-12  6:32 ` [PATCH 4/5] kernfs: introduce kernfs_pin_sb() and kernfs_drop_sb() Li Zefan
2014-06-12  6:33 ` [PATCH 5/5] cgroup: fix a race between cgroup_mount() and cgroup_kill_sb() Li Zefan
2014-06-20 19:35   ` Tejun Heo
2014-06-24  1:22     ` Li Zefan
2014-06-24 21:01       ` Tejun Heo
2014-06-25  1:56         ` Li Zefan
2014-06-25 15:00           ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2014-06-27  6:32             ` Li Zefan
2014-06-27 15:00               ` Tejun Heo
2014-06-17 19:26 ` [PATCH 1/5] cgroup: fix broken css_has_online_children() Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140625150053.GE26883@htj.dyndns.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®