From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755982AbaFYWct (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jun 2014 18:32:49 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:48606 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752104AbaFYWcr (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jun 2014 18:32:47 -0400 Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 15:32:46 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Rasmus Villemoes Cc: Artem Bityutskiy , Don Mullis , Dave Chinner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] lib: list_sort: Various minor improvements Message-Id: <20140625153246.3d3dbda781ce1af5524269ab@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <87egycoc8t.fsf@rasmusvillemoes.dk> References: <1403604392-23259-1-git-send-email-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> <20140625145314.3e16af6998765b7aad860bf7@linux-foundation.org> <87egycoc8t.fsf@rasmusvillemoes.dk> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.2.0beta5 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 00:28:18 +0200 Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > > We may as well do the pr_foo() conversion as well. As often happens, > > the results are quite pleasing. > > > > --- a/lib/list_sort.c~lib-list_sortc-convert-to-pr_foo > > +++ a/lib/list_sort.c > > @@ -1,3 +1,6 @@ > > + > > +#define pr_fmt(fmt) "list_sort_test: " fmt > > + > > #include > > #include > > #include > > @@ -125,9 +128,8 @@ void list_sort(void *priv, struct list_h > > } > > if (lev > max_lev) { > > if (unlikely(lev >= ARRAY_SIZE(part)-1)) { > > - printk_once(KERN_DEBUG "list passed to" > > - " list_sort() too long for" > > - " efficiency\n"); > > + pr_debug_once("list passed to list_sort() too " > > + "long for efficiency\n"); > > Minor comment: Won't this end up saying "list_sort_test: list passed to > ...", despite the list coming from a 'real' user? Maybe change the first > #define to '"list_sort: " fmt', the above message to "passed list too > long for efficiency", and redefine pr_fmt right after #ifdef > CONFIG_TEST_LIST_SORT. Yeah, I was hoping nobody would notice that ;) How about just printk_once(KERN_DEBUG "list too long for efficiency\n");