From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757583AbaFYPxP (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jun 2014 11:53:15 -0400 Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([92.198.50.35]:56399 "EHLO metis.ext.pengutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756777AbaFYPxN (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jun 2014 11:53:13 -0400 Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 17:52:59 +0200 From: Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= To: David Laight Cc: "'Guenter Roeck'" , Russell King , Peter Zijlstra , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Dietmar Eggemann , Ingo Molnar , Paul Mackerras , Vincent Guittot , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" , Ingo Molnar , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched: Fix compiler warnings Message-ID: <20140625155259.GQ14781@pengutronix.de> References: <1403658329-13196-1-git-send-email-linux@roeck-us.net> <20140625071416.GM14781@pengutronix.de> <53AADC63.8080106@roeck-us.net> <20140625144955.GP14781@pengutronix.de> <53AAE4D2.5020104@roeck-us.net> <063D6719AE5E284EB5DD2968C1650D6D17265D81@AcuExch.aculab.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <063D6719AE5E284EB5DD2968C1650D6D17265D81@AcuExch.aculab.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:6f8:1178:2:5054:ff:fec0:8e10 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ukl@pengutronix.de X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on metis.ext.pengutronix.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PTX-Original-Recipient: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 03:40:28PM +0000, David Laight wrote: > From: Guenter Roeck > > Actually turns out one can use __attribute_const__, and it is > > > > static inline int __attribute_const__ cpu_corepower_flags(void) > > > > which turns out to be widely used. > > > > I'll change that and resubmit after testing. > > You don't need to tell the compiler that for an inline function. I didn't check for the functions in question here, but in general your statement is wrong. For example: static inline unsigned int __attribute_const__ read_cpuid_id(void) { return readl(BASEADDR_V7M_SCB + V7M_SCB_CPUID); } from arch/arm/include/asm/cputype.h. The V7M_SCB_CPUID register never changes, but there is no way gcc can deduce that. Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |