From: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
To: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@freescale.com>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>,
Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Lior Amsalem <alior@marvell.com>,
Tawfik Bayouk <tawfik@marvell.com>,
Nadav Haklai <nadavh@marvell.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] ARM: smp_scu: Used defined value instead of literal constant
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 08:08:16 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140627120816.GD23978@titan.lakedaemon.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53ACA4F3.2070206@free-electrons.com>
Gregory,
Since you'll be resending this:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 12:55:47AM +0200, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> On 27/06/2014 00:43, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> > The first bit of the SCU control register is actually the enable
> > it. So let's name it instead of using literal constant.
nit: s/^it/bit/
thx,
Jason.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/kernel/smp_scu.c | 10 ++++++----
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/smp_scu.c b/arch/arm/kernel/smp_scu.c
> > index 1aafa0d785eb..cfea41b41ad0 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/kernel/smp_scu.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/smp_scu.c
> > @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
> > #include <asm/cputype.h>
> >
> > #define SCU_CTRL 0x00
> > +#define SCU_CTRL_ENABLE BIT(1)
>
> As Ezequiel rightly pointed it to me, this line is obviously wrong!
> it should be
> +#define SCU_CTRL_ENABLE BIT(0)
>
> > #define SCU_CONFIG 0x04
> > #define SCU_CPU_STATUS 0x08
> > #define SCU_INVALIDATE 0x0c
> > @@ -43,17 +44,18 @@ void scu_enable(void __iomem *scu_base)
> > /* Cortex-A9 only */
> > if ((read_cpuid_id() & 0xff0ffff0) == 0x410fc090) {
> > scu_ctrl = readl_relaxed(scu_base + 0x30);
> > - if (!(scu_ctrl & 1))
> > - writel_relaxed(scu_ctrl | 0x1, scu_base + 0x30);
> > + if (!(scu_ctrl & SCU_CTRL_ENABLE))
> > + writel_relaxed(scu_ctrl | SCU_CTRL_ENABLE,
> > + scu_base + 0x30);
> > }
> > #endif
> >
> > scu_ctrl = readl_relaxed(scu_base + SCU_CTRL);
> > /* already enabled? */
> > - if (scu_ctrl & 1)
> > + if (scu_ctrl & SCU_CTRL_ENABLE)
> > return;
> >
> > - scu_ctrl |= 1;
> > + scu_ctrl |= SCU_CTRL_ENABLE;
> > writel_relaxed(scu_ctrl, scu_base + SCU_CTRL);
> >
> > /*
> >
>
>
> --
> Gregory Clement, Free Electrons
> Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
> development, consulting, training and support.
> http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-27 12:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-26 22:43 [PATCH 0/5] ARM: Centralize the access to the SCU register Gregory CLEMENT
2014-06-26 22:43 ` [PATCH 1/5] ARM: smp_scu: Used defined value instead of literal constant Gregory CLEMENT
2014-06-26 22:55 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-06-27 12:08 ` Jason Cooper [this message]
2014-06-26 22:43 ` [PATCH 2/5] ARM: smp_scu: Add the enable speculative linefills operation Gregory CLEMENT
2014-06-28 15:02 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-06-30 12:21 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-06-26 22:43 ` [PATCH 3/5] ARM: smp_scu: Add the enable standby operation Gregory CLEMENT
2014-06-26 22:43 ` [PATCH 4/5] ARM: mvebu: Enable SCU Speculative linefills to L2 for Armada 375/38x Gregory CLEMENT
2014-06-28 15:04 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-06-26 22:43 ` [PATCH 5/5] ARM: imx6q: Use the new function scu_standby_enable() Gregory CLEMENT
2014-06-26 22:56 ` [PATCH 0/5] ARM: Centralize the access to the SCU register Rob Herring
2014-06-26 23:01 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-07-01 7:42 ` Shawn Guo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140627120816.GD23978@titan.lakedaemon.net \
--to=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=alior@marvell.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com \
--cc=gregory.clement@free-electrons.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=nadavh@marvell.com \
--cc=sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com \
--cc=shawn.guo@freescale.com \
--cc=tawfik@marvell.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome