From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <mingo@redhat.com>,
<fweisbec@gmail.com>,
"<m.chehab@samsung.com> Xie XiuQi" <xiexiuqi@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing: Fix wraparound problems in "uptime" tracer
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 14:40:17 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140630144017.2abc48ba@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f2aafdcb7166ea8e825d43d5eb835ccfea7db1b0.1404149831.git.tony.luck@intel.com>
On Mon, 30 Jun 2014 11:17:18 -0700
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> wrote:
> There seem to be no non-racy solutions ... I've been wondering
> about giving up on a generic jiffies_to_nsec() function because
> people might use it in cases where the races might be likley to
> bite them. For my need, I think that "perfect is the enemy of good":
>
> 1) The race window is only a few microseconds wide
> 2) It only exists on 32-bit kernels - which are dying out on server
> systems because they can't handle the amounts of memory on modern
> machines.
> 3) It opens every 49 days (on a HZ=1000 system)
> 4) I'm logging error events that happen at a "per-month" frequency (or lower)
> 5) If the race does happen - the visible result is that we have a
> bad time logged against an error event.
>
> so what about this: ...
>
> From: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
>
> The "uptime" tracer added in:
> commit 8aacf017b065a805d27467843490c976835eb4a5
> tracing: Add "uptime" trace clock that uses jiffies
> has wraparound problems when the system has been up more
> than 1 hour 11 minutes and 34 seconds. It converts jiffies
> to nanoseconds using:
> (u64)jiffies_to_usecs(jiffy) * 1000ULL
> but since jiffies_to_usecs() only returns a 32-bit value, it
> truncates at 2^32 microseconds. An additional problem on 32-bit
> systems is that the argument is "unsigned long", so fixing the
> return value only helps until 2^32 jiffies (49.7 days on a HZ=1000
> system).
>
> We can't provide a full features jiffies_to_nsec() function in
> any safe way (32-bit systems need locking to read the full 64-bit
> jiffies value). Just do the best we can here and recognise that
> 32-bit systems may seem some timestamp anomolies if jiffies64
> was in the middle of rolling over a 2^32 boundary.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
> ---
> kernel/timeconst.bc | 6 ++++++
> kernel/trace/trace_clock.c | 10 ++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/timeconst.bc b/kernel/timeconst.bc
> index 511bdf2cafda..a5fef7a7fb27 100644
> --- a/kernel/timeconst.bc
> +++ b/kernel/timeconst.bc
> @@ -100,6 +100,12 @@ define timeconst(hz) {
> print "#define USEC_TO_HZ_DEN\t\t", 1000000/cd, "\n"
> print "\n"
>
> + obase=10
> + cd=gcd(hz,1000000000)
> + print "#define HZ_TO_NSEC_NUM\t\t", 1000000000/cd, "\n"
> + print "#define HZ_TO_NSEC_DEN\t\t", hz/cd, "\n"
> + print "\n"
> +
> print "#endif /* KERNEL_TIMECONST_H */\n"
> }
> halt
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_clock.c b/kernel/trace/trace_clock.c
> index 26dc348332b7..dc5b11b9f8a4 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_clock.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_clock.c
> @@ -59,13 +59,19 @@ u64 notrace trace_clock(void)
>
> /*
> * trace_jiffy_clock(): Simply use jiffies as a clock counter.
> + * This usage of jiffies_64 isn't safe on 32-bit, but we may be
> + * called from NMI context, and we have no safe way to get a timestamp.
> */
> u64 notrace trace_clock_jiffies(void)
> {
> - u64 jiffy = jiffies - INITIAL_JIFFIES;
> + u64 jiffy = jiffies_64 - INITIAL_JIFFIES;
>
> /* Return nsecs */
> - return (u64)jiffies_to_usecs(jiffy) * 1000ULL;
> +#if !(NSEC_PER_SEC % HZ)
> + return (NSEC_PER_SEC / HZ) * jiffy;
> +#else
> + return (jiffy * HZ_TO_NSEC_NUM) / HZ_TO_NSEC_DEN;
Wont this break on 32 bit systems. That is, you can't divide 64bit
integers without using do_div().
-- Steve
> +#endif
> }
>
> /*
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-30 18:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-28 11:09 [PATCH 0/2] tracing: fix uptime overflow problem Xie XiuQi
2014-06-28 11:10 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Xie XiuQi
2014-06-30 15:10 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-06-30 18:17 ` [PATCH] tracing: Fix wraparound problems in "uptime" tracer Tony Luck
2014-06-30 18:40 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2014-06-30 20:31 ` [PATCH-v2] " Tony Luck
2014-07-17 23:02 ` Tony Luck
2014-07-18 2:08 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-07-18 17:05 ` Tony Luck
2014-07-18 17:36 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-07-18 18:43 ` [PATCH] " Tony Luck
2014-07-18 18:47 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-07-18 18:54 ` Tony Luck
2014-06-28 11:10 ` [PATCH 2/2] tracing: update Documentation/trace/ftrace.txt for uptime Xie XiuQi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140630144017.2abc48ba@gandalf.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=xiexiuqi@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®