From: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com>
To: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Tomasz Stanisławski" <t.stanislaws@samsung.com>,
"linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
"Mike Turquette" <mturquette@linaro.org>,
"Wolfram Sang" <wsa@the-dreams.de>,
"Andrzej Hajda" <a.hajda@samsung.com>,
"Mark Brown" <broonie@kernel.org>,
"Lee Jones" <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: ABBA deadlock in Common Clock Framework
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 14:49:24 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140702114924.GC3679@tbergstrom-lnx.Nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53B3E5F8.80501@samsung.com>
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 12:59:04PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> While testing linux-next (next-20140625) on Exynos4412-based TRATS2
> board, from time to time I hit a deadlock between clk_disable_unused()
> of Common Clock Framework and parallel clk_prepare() from s3c24xx-i2c
> driver.
>
> I believe the following is happening (in processes 1 and 2):
> 1: clk_disable_unused()
> 1: clk_prepare_lock()
> 1: mutex_lock(clk prepare mutex) // lock A
> 1: max77686_clk_is_prepared()
> 1: regmap_read()
> 2: regulator_set_voltage()
> 2: regmap_read()
> 2: mutex_lock(max77686 regmap mutex) // lock B
> 2: i2c_transfer()
> 2: s3c24xx_i2c_xfer()
> 2: clk_unprepare()
> 2: clk_prepare_lock()
> 2: mutex_lock(clk prepare mutex) // lock A
> 1: mutex_lock(max77686 regmap mutex) // lock B
> 1,2: BOOM!
>
> I suppose this is a general problem affecting any MFD device that is
> also a clock provider, but I clearly don't have a good idea what to do
> about it.
>
Or if you use notifiers which use i2c... See also
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1553699. One workaround is to
always leave the clock of the i2c controller in a prepared state.
Cheers,
Peter.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-02 11:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-02 10:59 Tomasz Figa
2014-07-02 11:23 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-07-02 11:49 ` Peter De Schrijver [this message]
2014-07-02 12:41 ` Sylwester Nawrocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140702114924.GC3679@tbergstrom-lnx.Nvidia.com \
--to=pdeschrijver@nvidia.com \
--cc=a.hajda@samsung.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@linaro.org \
--cc=t.figa@samsung.com \
--cc=t.stanislaws@samsung.com \
--cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®