From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
mingo@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, andi@firstfloor.org,
paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, pavel@ucw.cz, jirislaby@gmail.com,
Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.cz>, Michael Matz <matz@suse.de>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: kGraft to -next [was: 00/21 kGraft]
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 08:30:02 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140702123002.GA20071@mtj.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53B3F556.7050002@suse.cz>
Hello,
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 02:04:38PM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 06/25/2014 01:05 PM, Jiri Slaby wrote:
...
> > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/jirislaby/kgraft.git/log/?h=kgraft
>
> Stephen,
>
> may I ask you to add the kGraft tree to -next?
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jirislaby/kgraft.git#kgraft
Do we have consensus on the approach? I personally really don't like
the fact that it's adding another aspect to kthread management which
is difficult to get right and nearly impossible to verify
automatically.
IIUC, there are three similar solutions. What are the pros and cons
of each? Can we combine the different approaches?
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-02 12:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-25 11:05 [PATCH 00/21] kGraft Jiri Slaby
2014-06-25 12:54 ` One Thousand Gnomes
2014-06-25 15:54 ` Jiri Kosina
2014-06-26 5:50 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2014-07-02 12:04 ` kGraft to -next [was: 00/21 kGraft] Jiri Slaby
2014-07-02 12:30 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2014-07-02 12:47 ` One Thousand Gnomes
2014-07-02 13:01 ` Jiri Kosina
2014-07-02 13:30 ` Tejun Heo
2014-07-05 20:04 ` Jiri Kosina
2014-07-05 20:36 ` Tejun Heo
2014-07-05 20:49 ` Jiri Kosina
2014-07-05 21:04 ` Tejun Heo
2014-07-05 21:06 ` Jiri Kosina
2014-07-05 21:08 ` Tejun Heo
2014-07-29 14:05 ` Jiri Kosina
2014-07-02 12:47 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-07-02 16:28 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2014-07-03 0:26 ` Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140702123002.GA20071@mtj.dyndns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=jirislaby@gmail.com \
--cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
--cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matz@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=vojtech@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome