mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
To: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] hwrng: Allow drivers to disable reading during probe
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 09:41:56 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140702134156.GL23978@titan.lakedaemon.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140702132635.GD7505@grmbl.mre>

On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 06:56:35PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
> Hi Jason,
> 
> On (Wed) 02 Jul 2014 [13:00:19], Jason Cooper wrote:
> > Commit d9e7972619334 "hwrng: add randomness to system from rng sources"
> > added a call to rng_get_data() from the hwrng_register() function.
> > However, some rng devices need initialization before data can be read
> > from them.
> > 
> > Also, the virtio-rng device does not behave properly when this call is
> > made in its probe() routine - the virtio core sets the DRIVER_OK status
> > bit only on a successful probe, which means the host ignores all
> > communication from the guest, and the guest insmod or boot process just
> > sits there doing nothing.
> > 
> > [ jac: Modify the API to allow drivers to disable reading at probe, new
> > patch, copied Amit's commit message. ]
> > 
> > CC: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> > CC: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
> > CC: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
> > CC: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+
> > Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
> > ---
> >  drivers/char/hw_random/core.c | 8 +++++---
> >  include/linux/hw_random.h     | 4 ++++
> >  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/char/hw_random/core.c b/drivers/char/hw_random/core.c
> > index 334601cc81cf..b7b6c48ca682 100644
> > --- a/drivers/char/hw_random/core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/char/hw_random/core.c
> > @@ -347,9 +347,11 @@ int hwrng_register(struct hwrng *rng)
> >  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rng->list);
> >  	list_add_tail(&rng->list, &rng_list);
> >  
> > -	bytes_read = rng_get_data(rng, bytes, sizeof(bytes), 1);
> > -	if (bytes_read > 0)
> > -		add_device_randomness(bytes, bytes_read);
> > +	if (!(rng->flags & HWRNG_NO_READ_AT_PROBE)) {
> > +		bytes_read = rng_get_data(rng, bytes, sizeof(bytes), 1);
> > +		if (bytes_read > 0)
> > +			add_device_randomness(bytes, bytes_read);
> > +	}
> 
> But this has the inverse problem: if there are two hwrngs in the
> system, one will be initialized and probed.  The other will not be
> initialized, but still be probed.

That's a problem outside the scope of this patch.  You're basically
saying the ->init() should be called unconditionally for each hwrng.  If
that's what driver authors assumed, that's not what is happening if
there is more than one driver in the system.

I think you should be changing the code a few lines up to make sure
hwrng_init() is called once for each driver.

> My version was more conservative while this one keeps the bug from the
> current kernels.

Huh?  What do you mean by "keeps the bug from the current kernels." ?

Besides, you're second patch isn't actually doing any ->init to get the
hwrng ready for reading...  If you had a real ->init function, and it
was always called, would rng_get_data() work at probe time for your
driver?

confused,

Jason.

  reply	other threads:[~2014-07-02 13:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-02 10:28 [PATCH 0/2] hwrng: don't fetch data before device init Amit Shah
2014-07-02 10:28 ` [PATCH 1/2] hwrng: don't fetch rng from sources without init Amit Shah
2014-07-02 11:58   ` Jason Cooper
2014-07-02 12:11     ` Amit Shah
2014-07-02 12:14       ` Jason Cooper
2014-07-02 10:28 ` [PATCH 2/2] virtio: rng: introduce an init fn for hwrng core Amit Shah
2014-07-02 13:00 ` [PATCH 1/2 v2] hwrng: Allow drivers to disable reading during probe Jason Cooper
2014-07-02 13:00   ` [PATCH 2/2 v2] hwrng: virtio: " Jason Cooper
2014-07-02 13:26   ` [PATCH 1/2 v2] hwrng: Allow drivers to " Amit Shah
2014-07-02 13:41     ` Jason Cooper [this message]
2014-07-02 15:11       ` Kees Cook
2014-07-02 16:02         ` Amit Shah
2014-07-02 15:58       ` Amit Shah

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140702134156.GL23978@titan.lakedaemon.net \
    --to=jason@lakedaemon.net \
    --cc=amit.shah@redhat.com \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®