From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759074AbaGCQ6j (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Jul 2014 12:58:39 -0400 Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk ([106.187.55.193]:45222 "EHLO mezzanine.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752324AbaGCQ6i (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Jul 2014 12:58:38 -0400 Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2014 17:58:13 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Nikesh Oswal Cc: lgirdwood@gmail.com, perex@perex.cz, tiwai@suse.de, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com, Nikesh Oswal Message-ID: <20140703165813.GL410@sirena.org.uk> References: <1404400687-19035-1-git-send-email-nikesh@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9axOBMfiLLqytT81" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1404400687-19035-1-git-send-email-nikesh@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> X-Cookie: Semper Fi, dude. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 94.175.94.161 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: arizona-ldo1: remove bypass functionality X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mezzanine.sirena.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --9axOBMfiLLqytT81 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 04:18:07PM +0100, Nikesh Oswal wrote: > From: Nikesh Oswal >=20 > WM5110/8280 devices do not support bypass mode for LDO1 so remove > the bypass callbacks registered with regulator core. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Nikesh Oswal Please fix your configuration so that these two line up, it raises red flags that they don't even though it's fairly clear that they're most likely both for the same person. I'd recommend not using your corporate mail for community work since if you reply from it and get a mail footer added (as is standard) people will tend not to respond positively. --9axOBMfiLLqytT81 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTtYuiAAoJELSic+t+oim9R44QAIAYeB4615iWhEuXN5S4bx65 mSlk+vXmJfJBevmNx1jGA8pEN7yEW96Ba8tJGWVQX5kOPYS1qD+0i8CmSRvX3jUH Xtbpw6SEbTzQipVP16d+sJRdyew5Fiiv19ic2B9HGyagkG8lm2WENlJFnFkapOKp 6VEfWGby2dJ87E63yu8GtQeDgPwdByeGkhfiiOsrjJ2ySF1aqwe6ez7FE+6FAccD 4zNeU6rbMtsH9rjuXEzv9fxxrqZJc/gdHRJ2KnIuy0GDSzst1WarX4awDFTVGhnr rdUyClW/0ZvZ3fXVyJKsNsrxqmFvFT+NDw6SwtH0ISTuW8+lLlHatGWbUxfsqa5N lBVrTJbd0i0uUTWGr2MVOpLMVGrFvCyoMOaecN4vlIhiKU6i2VvYNj11JprxeR/m Ggm+mII12jHFymd6/B/A9yQ7TNfQH6PThjoYsr8fATU3A8r7E/VQIknwt/0vPZtE ES/NU/D30cLvI+QLvzNQaUep+IdgkUDZD8c2m2DXiVfoc2kaV2RogSFX8WI3ENDa 8VRQf6Ip5E9ZgtH/WNfN+841u2bk5U73cw+q6U9dFauLn6jDAfzLpCa1OSzEfVSi ulNCfQJ7cJJwLZWS02i2+zzuGjQKuuHXtGrSOD4xDmXQaiR3Ta7zrkE9yDsI7qnI NP3yqF4XOTHcxJBzExpp =njBQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --9axOBMfiLLqytT81--