From: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
To: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Virtualization List <virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, keescook@chromium.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] virtio: rng: ensure reads happen after successful probe
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2014 12:18:36 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140709161836.GQ13433@titan.lakedaemon.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f64852e0dd8a439193db4c7da1d3022d029cc85d.1404538109.git.amit.shah@redhat.com>
On Sat, Jul 05, 2014 at 11:04:53AM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
> The hwrng core asks for random data in the hwrng_register() call itself
> from commit d9e7972619. This doesn't play well with virtio -- the
> DRIVER_OK bit is only set by virtio core on a successful probe, and
> we're not yet out of our probe routine when this call is made. This
> causes the host to not acknowledge any requests we put in the virtqueue,
> and the insmod or kernel boot process just waits for data to arrive from
> the host, which never happens.
>
> CC: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> CC: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
> CC: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
> CC: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # For v3.15+
> Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/char/hw_random/core.c | 6 ++++++
> drivers/char/hw_random/virtio-rng.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+)
Yeah, I don't think there's any viable way to get random data out of
virtio-rng at probe time... :-(
Reviewed-by: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/hw_random/core.c b/drivers/char/hw_random/core.c
> index df95e2f..50f5b76 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/hw_random/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/hw_random/core.c
> @@ -68,6 +68,12 @@ static void add_early_randomness(struct hwrng *rng)
> unsigned char bytes[16];
> int bytes_read;
>
> + /*
> + * Currently only virtio-rng cannot return data during device
> + * probe, and that's handled in virtio-rng.c itself. If there
> + * are more such devices, this call to rng_get_data can be
> + * made conditional here instead of doing it per-device.
> + */
> bytes_read = rng_get_data(rng, bytes, sizeof(bytes), 1);
> if (bytes_read > 0)
> add_device_randomness(bytes, bytes_read);
> diff --git a/drivers/char/hw_random/virtio-rng.c b/drivers/char/hw_random/virtio-rng.c
> index f3e7150..157f27c 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/hw_random/virtio-rng.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/hw_random/virtio-rng.c
> @@ -38,6 +38,8 @@ struct virtrng_info {
> int index;
> };
>
> +bool probe_done;
> +
> static void random_recv_done(struct virtqueue *vq)
> {
> struct virtrng_info *vi = vq->vdev->priv;
> @@ -67,6 +69,13 @@ static int virtio_read(struct hwrng *rng, void *buf, size_t size, bool wait)
> int ret;
> struct virtrng_info *vi = (struct virtrng_info *)rng->priv;
>
> + /*
> + * Don't ask host for data till we're setup. This call can
> + * happen during hwrng_register(), after commit d9e7972619.
nit: There's no need to reference the commit in the comment, you already
mention it in the commit log.
thx,
Jason.
> + */
> + if (unlikely(!probe_done))
> + return 0;
> +
> if (!vi->busy) {
> vi->busy = true;
> init_completion(&vi->have_data);
> @@ -137,6 +146,7 @@ static int probe_common(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> return err;
> }
>
> + probe_done = true;
> return 0;
> }
>
> --
> 1.9.3
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-09 16:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-05 5:34 [PATCH v2 0/2] hwrng, virtio-rng: init-time fixes Amit Shah
2014-07-05 5:34 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] hwrng: fetch randomness only after device init Amit Shah
2014-07-07 4:41 ` Kees Cook
2014-07-07 5:53 ` Amit Shah
2014-07-07 6:04 ` Amit Shah
2014-07-07 6:39 ` Amit Shah
2014-07-09 11:53 ` Jason Cooper
2014-07-09 13:08 ` Amit Shah
2014-07-09 13:17 ` Jason Cooper
2014-07-09 13:25 ` Amit Shah
2014-07-09 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH] hwrng: sysfs entry rng_seed_kernel, was: "Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] hwrng: fetch randomness only after device init" Jason Cooper
2014-07-11 13:26 ` Amit Shah
2014-07-11 15:44 ` Jason Cooper
2014-07-14 21:50 ` Kees Cook
2014-07-05 5:34 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] virtio: rng: ensure reads happen after successful probe Amit Shah
2014-07-07 4:38 ` Kees Cook
2014-07-07 5:51 ` Amit Shah
2014-07-07 6:09 ` Kees Cook
2014-07-07 6:34 ` Amit Shah
2014-07-09 12:08 ` Jason Cooper
2014-07-09 13:15 ` Amit Shah
2014-07-09 16:18 ` Jason Cooper [this message]
2014-07-10 8:45 ` Herbert Xu
2014-07-10 9:53 ` Amit Shah
2014-07-10 8:52 ` Amit Shah
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140709161836.GQ13433@titan.lakedaemon.net \
--to=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=amit.shah@redhat.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®