From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934169AbaGPF33 (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jul 2014 01:29:29 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:60677 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754973AbaGPF3Z (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jul 2014 01:29:25 -0400 Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 22:29:19 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, clm@fb.com, jbacik@fb.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jeffm@suse.com, fdmanana@suse.com, "Luis R. Rodriguez" Subject: Re: [RFC 0/2] vfs / btrfs: add support for ustat() Message-ID: <20140716052919.GA3486@infradead.org> References: <1405465625-1122-1-git-send-email-mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1405465625-1122-1-git-send-email-mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Isn't this the problem again the btrfs uses different assignments for st_dev than s_dev? I don't even want to think about a mess like this before that is fixed.