Re: [PATCH 25/25] ipack: Replace DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE macro use

[Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 05:59:16PM +0200, Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-07-18 at 17:27 +0200, Benoit Taine wrote:
> > We should prefer `struct pci_device_id` over `DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE` to meet
> > kernel coding style guidelines. This issue was reported by checkpatch.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Benoit Taine <benoit.taine@lip6.fr>
> > 
> > ---
> > Tested by compilation without errors.
> > 
> >  drivers/ipack/carriers/tpci200.c |    2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/ipack/carriers/tpci200.c b/drivers/ipack/carriers/tpci200.c
> > index c276fde..de5e321 100644
> > --- a/drivers/ipack/carriers/tpci200.c
> > +++ b/drivers/ipack/carriers/tpci200.c
> > @@ -618,7 +618,7 @@ static void tpci200_pci_remove(struct pci_dev *dev)
> >  	__tpci200_pci_remove(tpci200);
> >  }
> >  
> > -static DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE(tpci200_idtable) = {
> > +static const struct pci_device_id tpci200_idtable[] = {
> >  	{ TPCI200_VENDOR_ID, TPCI200_DEVICE_ID, TPCI200_SUBVENDOR_ID,
> >  	  TPCI200_SUBDEVICE_ID },
> >  	{ 0, },
> > 
> > 
> 
> Acked-by: Samuel Iglesias Gonsalvez <siglesias@igalia.com>
> 
> Greg, Would you mind picking this patch through your char-misc tree?

Will do, thanks.

greg k-h