From: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
To: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Virtualization List <virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, keescook@chromium.org,
Amos Kong <akong@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] virtio: rng: delay hwrng_register() till driver is ready
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 08:11:16 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140721121116.GA18750@titan.lakedaemon.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <91cb7c5b87cf2ba5ef1bacd55a7ee7bc827293a2.1405942162.git.amit.shah@redhat.com>
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 05:15:51PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
> Instead of calling hwrng_register() in the probe routing, call it in the
> scan routine. This ensures that when hwrng_register() is successful,
> and it requests a few random bytes to seed the kernel's pool at init,
> we're ready to service that request.
>
> This will also enable us to remove the workaround added previously to
> check whether probe was completed, and only then ask for data from the
> host. The revert follows in the next commit.
>
> There's a slight behaviour change here on unsuccessful hwrng_register().
> Previously, when hwrng_unregister() failed, the probe() routine would
> fail, and the vqs would be torn down, and driver would be marked not
> initialized. Now, the vqs will remain initialized, driver would be
> marked initialized as well, but won't be available in the list of RNGs
> available to hwrng core. To fix the failures, the procedure remains the
> same, i.e. unload and re-load the module, and hope things succeed the
> next time around.
I'm not too comfortable with this. I'll try to take a closer look
tonight, but in the meantime...
> Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/char/hw_random/virtio-rng.c | 25 +++++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/hw_random/virtio-rng.c b/drivers/char/hw_random/virtio-rng.c
> index a156284..d9927eb 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/hw_random/virtio-rng.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/hw_random/virtio-rng.c
> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ struct virtrng_info {
> unsigned int data_avail;
> int index;
> bool busy;
> + bool hwrng_register_done;
> };
>
> static bool probe_done;
> @@ -136,15 +137,6 @@ static int probe_common(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> return err;
> }
>
> - err = hwrng_register(&vi->hwrng);
> - if (err) {
> - vdev->config->del_vqs(vdev);
> - vi->vq = NULL;
> - kfree(vi);
> - ida_simple_remove(&rng_index_ida, index);
> - return err;
> - }
> -
This needs to stay. register, and failure to do so, should occur in the
probe routine.
> probe_done = true;
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -152,9 +144,11 @@ static int probe_common(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> static void remove_common(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> {
> struct virtrng_info *vi = vdev->priv;
> +
> vdev->config->reset(vdev);
> vi->busy = false;
> - hwrng_unregister(&vi->hwrng);
> + if (vi->hwrng_register_done)
> + hwrng_unregister(&vi->hwrng);
> vdev->config->del_vqs(vdev);
> ida_simple_remove(&rng_index_ida, vi->index);
> kfree(vi);
> @@ -170,6 +164,16 @@ static void virtrng_remove(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> remove_common(vdev);
> }
>
> +static void virtrng_scan(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> +{
> + struct virtrng_info *vi = vdev->priv;
> + int err;
> +
> + err = hwrng_register(&vi->hwrng);
> + if (!err)
> + vi->hwrng_register_done = true;
Instead, perhaps we should just feed the entropy pool from here? We
would still need to prevent the core from doing so. Perhaps back to the
flag idea?
thx,
Jason.
> +}
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> static int virtrng_freeze(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> {
> @@ -194,6 +198,7 @@ static struct virtio_driver virtio_rng_driver = {
> .id_table = id_table,
> .probe = virtrng_probe,
> .remove = virtrng_remove,
> + .scan = virtrng_scan,
> #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> .freeze = virtrng_freeze,
> .restore = virtrng_restore,
> --
> 1.9.3
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-21 12:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-21 11:45 [PATCH v2 0/4] virtio-rng: contribute to early randomness requests Amit Shah
2014-07-21 11:45 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] virtio: rng: remove unused struct element Amit Shah
2014-07-21 11:45 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] virtio: rng: re-arrange struct elements for better packing Amit Shah
2014-07-21 11:45 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] virtio: rng: delay hwrng_register() till driver is ready Amit Shah
2014-07-21 12:11 ` Jason Cooper [this message]
2014-07-21 12:21 ` Amit Shah
2014-07-21 12:41 ` Herbert Xu
2014-07-22 11:43 ` Jason Cooper
2014-07-22 17:08 ` Amit Shah
2014-07-23 5:51 ` Rusty Russell
2014-07-21 11:45 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] Revert "hwrng: virtio - ensure reads happen after successful probe" Amit Shah
2014-07-22 11:46 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] virtio-rng: contribute to early randomness requests Jason Cooper
2014-07-22 15:08 ` Amit Shah
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140721121116.GA18750@titan.lakedaemon.net \
--to=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=akong@redhat.com \
--cc=amit.shah@redhat.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®