From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755253AbaGUNWT (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jul 2014 09:22:19 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:50464 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755243AbaGUNWS (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jul 2014 09:22:18 -0400 Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 15:22:13 +0200 From: Michal Hocko To: Johannes Weiner Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML , Tejun Heo , Hugh Dickins , Greg Thelen , Vladimir Davydov , Glauber Costa , Andrew Morton , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , KOSAKI Motohiro Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] memcg: export knobs for the defaul cgroup hierarchy Message-ID: <20140721132213.GE8393@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <1405521578-19988-1-git-send-email-mhocko@suse.cz> <20140716155814.GZ29639@cmpxchg.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140716155814.GZ29639@cmpxchg.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed 16-07-14 11:58:14, Johannes Weiner wrote: > On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 04:39:38PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: [...] > > +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM > > + { > > + .name = "kmem.limit_in_bytes", > > + .private = MEMFILE_PRIVATE(_KMEM, RES_LIMIT), > > + .write = mem_cgroup_write, > > + .read_u64 = mem_cgroup_read_u64, > > + }, > > Does it really make sense to have a separate limit for kmem only? It seems that needs furhter discussion so I will drop it in next version of the patch and we can enable it or move to a single knob for U+K later. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs