From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Josh Boyer <jwboyer@redhat.com>,
"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: Scheduler regression from caffcdd8d27ba78730d5540396ce72ad022aff2c
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 15:35:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140722133514.GM12054@laptop.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140722132603.GL12054@laptop.lan>
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 03:26:03PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 03:03:43PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Oh, of course we do SMP detection and setup after the cache setup...
> > lovely.
> >
> > /me goes bang head against wall
>
> hpa, could we move the legacy cpuid1/cpuid4 topology detection muck up,
> preferably right after detect_extended_topology()?
>
> I need c->phys_proc_id in init_intel_cacheinfo() for machines with
> cpuid_level < 4.
Something like so.. anything obviously broken?
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c | 12 ++++++++++++
2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
index 0fd955778f35..9483ee5b3991 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
@@ -370,6 +370,17 @@ static void init_intel(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
*/
detect_extended_topology(c);
+ if (!cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_XTOPOLOGY)) {
+ /*
+ * let's use the legacy cpuid vector 0x1 and 0x4 for topology
+ * detection.
+ */
+ c->x86_max_cores = intel_num_cpu_cores(c);
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
+ detect_ht(c);
+#endif
+ }
+
l2 = init_intel_cacheinfo(c);
if (c->cpuid_level > 9) {
unsigned eax = cpuid_eax(10);
@@ -438,17 +449,6 @@ static void init_intel(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
set_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_P3);
#endif
- if (!cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_XTOPOLOGY)) {
- /*
- * let's use the legacy cpuid vector 0x1 and 0x4 for topology
- * detection.
- */
- c->x86_max_cores = intel_num_cpu_cores(c);
-#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
- detect_ht(c);
-#endif
- }
-
/* Work around errata */
srat_detect_node(c);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c
index a952e9c85b6f..9c8f7394c612 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c
@@ -730,6 +730,18 @@ unsigned int init_intel_cacheinfo(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
#endif
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_HT
+ /*
+ * If cpu_llc_id is not yet set, this means cpuid_level < 4 which in
+ * turns means that the only possibility is SMT (as indicated in
+ * cpuid1). Since cpuid2 doesn't specify shared caches, and we know
+ * that SMT shares all caches, we can unconditionally set cpu_llc_id to
+ * c->phys_proc_id.
+ */
+ if (per_cpu(cpu_llc_id, cpu) == BAD_APICID)
+ per_cpu(cpu_llc_id, cpu) = c->phys_proc_id;
+#endif
+
c->x86_cache_size = l3 ? l3 : (l2 ? l2 : (l1i+l1d));
return l2;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-22 13:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-16 14:55 Bruno Wolff III
2014-07-16 15:17 ` Josh Boyer
2014-07-16 19:17 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-07-16 19:54 ` Bruno Wolff III
2014-07-16 23:18 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-07-17 3:09 ` Bruno Wolff III
2014-07-17 8:57 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-07-17 9:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-17 11:23 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-07-17 12:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-18 5:34 ` Bruno Wolff III
2014-07-18 9:28 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-07-18 12:09 ` Bruno Wolff III
2014-07-18 10:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-18 13:01 ` Bruno Wolff III
2014-07-18 14:16 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-07-18 14:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-18 14:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-18 16:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-21 16:35 ` Bruno Wolff III
2014-07-21 16:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-22 9:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-22 10:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-22 12:10 ` Bruno Wolff III
2014-07-22 13:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-22 13:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-22 13:35 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2014-07-22 14:09 ` Bruno Wolff III
2014-07-22 14:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-23 1:37 ` Bruno Wolff III
2014-07-23 6:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-22 17:05 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-07-23 15:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-23 15:12 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-07-24 1:45 ` Bruno Wolff III
2014-07-23 15:39 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86, cpu: Fix cache topology for early P4-SMT tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-22 12:12 ` Scheduler regression from caffcdd8d27ba78730d5540396ce72ad022aff2c Dietmar Eggemann
2014-07-22 12:57 ` Bruno Wolff III
2014-07-28 8:28 ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Robustify topology setup tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-17 16:36 ` Scheduler regression from caffcdd8d27ba78730d5540396ce72ad022aff2c Bruno Wolff III
2014-07-17 18:43 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-07-17 18:54 ` Bruno Wolff III
2014-07-17 4:21 ` Bruno Wolff III
2014-07-17 4:28 ` Bruno Wolff III
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140722133514.GM12054@laptop.lan \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=bruno@wolff.to \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jwboyer@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®