From: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
To: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, kay@vrfy.org, pmladek@suse.cz,
john.stultz@linaro.org, jack@suse.cz,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] printk: more log flag simplification
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 16:24:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140722142456.GB10670@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1406037717-9670-1-git-send-email-elder@linaro.org>
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 09:01:55AM -0500, Alex Elder wrote:
> This series eliminates the LOG_CONT entirely from the printk/log code.
> It builds on another series, posted earlier today:
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg1791665.html
> This series was originally longer, but in review I was reminded
> that some of the simplifications I had done were not valid.
>
> The first patch exploits the fact that LOG_CONT and LOG_NEWLINE
> are inverses, and uses LOG_NEWLINE (or its negation) anywhere
> LOG_CONT is used. As a result, LOG_CONT is no longer needed, so
> it's eliminated.
>
> The second patch improves some comments and makes a few small
> code cleanups, now that it's gone through this transformation.
This is getting ridiculous - you've been spamming me with printk patches
like crazy every day! I told you to wait a bit with a resend until
people have had a chance to review them, but you don't seem to care.
Would you please remove me from your CC list?
Thank you.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-22 14:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-22 14:01 Alex Elder
2014-07-22 14:01 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] printk: kill LOG_CONT Alex Elder
2014-07-22 14:01 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] printk: improve some commentary; tidy up Alex Elder
2014-07-22 14:24 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2014-07-22 15:55 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] printk: more log flag simplification Alex Elder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140722142456.GB10670@pd.tnic \
--to=bp@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=elder@linaro.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=kay@vrfy.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®