mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, H Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] x86, microcode, intel: don't use fields from unknown format header
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 13:37:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140724113726.GL19239@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1406146251-8540-6-git-send-email-hmh@hmh.eng.br>

On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 05:10:48PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> We must make sure the microcode has a known header format before
> we attempt to access its Total Size or Data Size fields through
> get_totalsize() or get_datasize().

Well, this is a pretty weak check but I'm all for being as defensive as
possible with the microcode loader so yes, let's do it.

However, I'd carve it out from microcode_sanity_check() in a separate
function called

static bool microcode_check_header(struct microcode_header_intel *hdr);

and do the ->hdrver and -> ldrver checks in it. In two places to be exact...

> Signed-off-by: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c       |    5 +++++
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel_early.c |    3 +++
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel_lib.c   |   11 ++++++-----
>  3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
> index a51cb19..61d430e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
> @@ -199,6 +199,11 @@ static enum ucode_state generic_load_microcode(int cpu, void *data, size_t size,
>  		if (get_ucode_data(&mc_header, ucode_ptr, sizeof(mc_header)))
>  			break;
>  
> +		if (mc_header.hdrver != 1) {
> +			pr_err("error! Unknown microcode update format\n");
> +			break;
> +		}

... here ...

> +
>  		mc_size = get_totalsize(&mc_header);
>  		if (!mc_size || mc_size > leftover) {
>  			pr_err("error! Bad data in microcode data file\n");
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel_early.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel_early.c
> index b88343f..c1bf915f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel_early.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel_early.c
> @@ -324,6 +324,9 @@ get_matching_model_microcode(int cpu, unsigned long start,
>  	while (leftover) {
>  		mc_header = (struct microcode_header_intel *)ucode_ptr;
>  
> +		if (mc_header->hdrver != 1)
> +			break;
> +

... and here. I.e., everytime we're looking at a mc_header from userspace.

>  		mc_size = get_totalsize(mc_header);
>  		if (!mc_size || mc_size > leftover ||
>  			microcode_sanity_check(ucode_ptr, 0) < 0)
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel_lib.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel_lib.c
> index ce69320..95c2d19 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel_lib.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel_lib.c
> @@ -52,6 +52,12 @@ int microcode_sanity_check(void *mc, int print_err)
>  	int sum, orig_sum, ext_sigcount = 0, i;
>  	struct extended_signature *ext_sig;
>  
> +	if (mc_header->ldrver != 1 || mc_header->hdrver != 1) {
> +		if (print_err)
> +			pr_err("error! Unknown microcode update format\n");
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
>  	total_size = get_totalsize(mc_header);
>  	data_size = get_datasize(mc_header);
>  
> @@ -61,11 +67,6 @@ int microcode_sanity_check(void *mc, int print_err)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (mc_header->ldrver != 1 || mc_header->hdrver != 1) {
> -		if (print_err)
> -			pr_err("error! Unknown microcode update format\n");
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -	}

This one is then redundant.

Thanks.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--

  reply	other threads:[~2014-07-24 11:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-23 20:10 [PATCH 0/8] x86, microcode: cosmetic and minor issue fixes Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-07-23 20:10 ` [PATCH 1/8] x86, microcode, amd: fix missing static declaration Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-07-24 10:24   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-23 20:10 ` [PATCH 2/8] x86, microcode, intel: fix missing static declarations Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-07-24 10:28   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-23 20:10 ` [PATCH 3/8] x86, microcode, intel: fix typos Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-07-24 10:33   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-23 20:10 ` [PATCH 4/8] x86, microcode, intel: fix missing declaration Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-07-24 11:01   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-24 14:27     ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-07-24 18:23   ` [PATCH v2 4/8] x86, microcode, intel: rename apply_microcode and declare it static Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-07-25 16:23     ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-23 20:10 ` [PATCH 5/8] x86, microcode, intel: don't use fields from unknown format header Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-07-24 11:37   ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2014-07-24 13:30     ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-07-24 14:28       ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-24 15:07         ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-07-24 16:29           ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-24 17:49             ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-07-23 20:10 ` [PATCH 6/8] x86, microcode, intel: total_size is valid only when data_size != 0 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-07-25 16:46   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-25 19:04     ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-07-28 14:26       ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-28 15:39         ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-07-23 20:10 ` [PATCH 7/8] x86, microcode, intel: forbid some incorrect metadata Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-07-28 15:31   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-28 19:37     ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-07-29 10:45       ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-29 20:25         ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-08-04 11:09           ` Borislav Petkov
2014-08-04 20:18             ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-08-08 12:54               ` Borislav Petkov
2014-08-08 13:50                 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-08-08 15:21                   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-08-08 15:45                     ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-07-23 20:10 ` [PATCH 8/8] x86, microcode, intel: correct extended signature checksum verification Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-07-28 20:36   ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-08-24 14:55 ` [tip:x86/microcode] x86, microcode, amd: Fix missing static declaration tip-bot for Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-08-24 14:55 ` [tip:x86/microcode] x86, microcode, intel: Add missing static declarations tip-bot for Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-08-24 14:56 ` [tip:x86/microcode] x86, microcode, intel: Fix typos tip-bot for Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-08-24 14:56 ` [tip:x86/microcode] x86, microcode, intel: Rename apply_microcode and declare it static tip-bot for Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-08-24 14:56 ` [tip:x86/microcode] x86, microcode, intel: Fix total_size computation tip-bot for Henrique de Moraes Holschuh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140724113726.GL19239@pd.tnic \
    --to=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome