mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
	Linux Kernel Developers List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v5] random: introduce getrandom(2) system call
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 17:30:19 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140724203019.GA20737@khazad-dum.debian.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140724190206.GL6673@thunk.org>

On Thu, 24 Jul 2014, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 08:21:38AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > > Should we add E<SOMETHING> to be able to deny access to GRND_RANDOM or some
> > > future extension ?
> > 
> > This might actually be needed sooner rather than later.  There are
> > programs that use containers and intentionally don't pass /dev/random
> > through into the container.  I know that Sandstorm does this, and I
> > wouldn't be surprised if other things (Docker?) do the same thing.
> 
> I wouldn't add the error to the man page until we actually modify the
> kernel to add such a restriction.

By then, it might be too late.  It would be really sad to find ourselves
forced to return ENOSYS to getrandom(GRND_RANDOM) when we actually wanted to
return EPERM/EACCES.

Actually, we might not be able to do even that much: all it takes is for
someone to have the bright idea of deploying userspace code that checks for
ENOSYS only on a first "probe" getrandom() syscall without GRND_RANDOM, and
does something idiotic when it gets ENOSYS later on a
getrandom(GRND_RANDOM).  meh.  We can't even abuse the system ourselves :-)

> However, the thought crossed my mind a while back that perhaps the
> right answer is a cgroup controller which controls the rate at which a
> process is allowed to drain entropy from the /dev/random pool.  This
> could be set to 0, or it could be set to N bits per unit time T, and
> if the process exceeded the value, it would just block or return
> EAGAIN.  So instead of making it be just a binary "you have access" or

That will teach people to not have a SIGALRM on code that calls a blocking
syscall, I suppose.  Still, there is a risk it could cause so much bad
application behaviour to the point of being unusable.

> Then I decided that it was overkill, but for people who are trying to

Indeed :p

-- 
  "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
  them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
  where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
  Henrique Holschuh

  reply	other threads:[~2014-07-24 20:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-24 14:31 Theodore Ts'o
2014-07-24 15:18 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-07-24 15:21   ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-07-24 19:02     ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-07-24 20:30       ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [this message]
2014-07-24 20:54         ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-07-24 23:27           ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-07-24 23:24         ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-07-24 23:27           ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-07-25 13:22             ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-07-25 12:46           ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-07-30 14:34 ` Rolf Eike Beer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140724203019.GA20737@khazad-dum.debian.net \
    --to=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®