From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752251AbaG3Kn0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jul 2014 06:43:26 -0400 Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk ([106.187.55.193]:34451 "EHLO mezzanine.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751887AbaG3KnY (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jul 2014 06:43:24 -0400 Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 11:42:53 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Javier Martinez Canillas Cc: Kukjin Kim , Doug Anderson , Olof Johansson , Yuvaraj Kumar C D , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20140730104253.GP17528@sirena.org.uk> References: <1406651339-28901-1-git-send-email-javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk> <1406651339-28901-4-git-send-email-javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk> <20140729171857.GV17528@sirena.org.uk> <53D8B195.4050003@collabora.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="x+ia+h3A4XZzeh4n" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <53D8B195.4050003@collabora.co.uk> X-Cookie: 98% lean. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 94.175.94.161 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: [RFC 3/5] regulator: core: Only apply constraints if available on list voltage X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mezzanine.sirena.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --x+ia+h3A4XZzeh4n Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 10:49:25AM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > On 07/29/2014 07:18 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > > I would also expect any regulator where the supplied devices are able to > > vary the voltage to explicitly provide a constraint even if the > > implementation is done in a parent regulator. There may be constraints > > on the child supply which aren't directly present on the parent supply > > and can be ignored if the child supply is turned off. > Agreed, if I explicitly set the voltage constraints on the child supply then > this patch is indeed not needed. We will, however, need some code to pass the child supply constraints on to the parent. --x+ia+h3A4XZzeh4n Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJT2MwqAAoJELSic+t+oim9aSMP/1mskx3pbsqkgw34u4P/2oU1 mEi0MeW02i1FYQnwqNFq8JZFzgik444f6vY73w6AOSnTP1Z5Z8x2YdYAbCd8ipmH SX/PUgrLUIU0y6bnbicfOkni74C+BfYHpoJxHQDQKAWq4qxUeW9WpNnVplboNZNt LJZktdAhs06OGgk/mevhppZ/xIauaJYJoaUbs+EniX5z6dYwTuFYPTQObjBhEt1w JHiAlZPuvGi6pFDYXqxL6vBtqskq6/qofqX3ojskIdSFsmag36GQcO5yclK5/kVe uiCFdG6ygzFlnytMENMRT6HapBvK9CQkY4qIFQGrt8edmVW2tGpvXm64MiMQ2VmM uUawHp4WOQB28oVSByDKK/UyXaACueOYu4EJfPnod4PCTJCDXS/OVpiucCwZCv8m JU5DI0fkj76eJqXP2Q0VIElDURwA8Hnq8hGfaMfMt8oPZPmC5QA4AOEoB+3oq0A3 SpB9jMiUefZ+nOAwI0cPdCHRSpiXm7w2qSYca0E+XxLvVvYffpTz0a9mxlBskgUy Yh3CSBiGycX+cQ4sjyje7Y6lpEEwq4Qg4P6wr4zk0ACIoXw0pdIcNNCHdpAJVUcx zE0PMpSm7cHEEVOc6ZEmzm5lCMnCWTNAw0G/b7gXDMduVROug5ow3wo5CcFmmOMC 4tpsCYLxwN5Zx5nzGEl0 =TkDr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --x+ia+h3A4XZzeh4n--