From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754927AbaG3Pfc (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jul 2014 11:35:32 -0400 Received: from mail-qg0-f43.google.com ([209.85.192.43]:34189 "EHLO mail-qg0-f43.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753046AbaG3Pfa (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jul 2014 11:35:30 -0400 Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 11:35:26 -0400 From: Tejun Heo To: Antoine =?iso-8859-1?Q?T=E9nart?= Cc: sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com, kishon@ti.com, alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com, thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com, zmxu@marvell.com, jszhang@marvell.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 3/8] ata: libahci_platform: move port_map parameters into the AHCI structure Message-ID: <20140730153526.GB23734@htj.dyndns.org> References: <1406193450-17283-1-git-send-email-antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com> <1406193450-17283-4-git-send-email-antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com> <20140729144042.GD4791@htj.dyndns.org> <20140730082038.GB29900@kwain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20140730082038.GB29900@kwain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 10:20:38AM +0200, Antoine Ténart wrote: > How do you want me to send the series? There is two conflicts when > applying to libata/for-3.17: > - patch 4/8: it takes into account a patch not in libata/for-3.17 but > added before rc7. It should be better to first merge rc7, otherwise > some modifications won't make sense. > - patch 6/8: "fsl,imx53-ahci" was removed from the documentation in > libata/for-3.17 but not in rc7. Resolving the conflict is really > simple. > > I think it's better to apply the whole thing after merging rc7 into > libata/for-3.17, because it will only have a really simple conflict to > resolve. > > Please tell me what do you prefer before I send the updated version. Hmmm... does pulling in libata/for-3.16-fixes into libata/for-3.17 resolves the conflict? If so, please send the patch on top of the merged branch. I wanna avoid pulling in -rc7 wholesale at this point. Thanks. -- tejun