From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755289AbaG3Qkh (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jul 2014 12:40:37 -0400 Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk ([106.187.55.193]:35477 "EHLO mezzanine.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753483AbaG3Qkf (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jul 2014 12:40:35 -0400 Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 17:40:14 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Mark Rutland Cc: Laxman Dewangan , "lgirdwood@gmail.com" , "robh+dt@kernel.org" , Pawel Moll , "ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk" , "galak@codeaurora.org" , "grant.likely@linaro.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Message-ID: <20140730164014.GY17528@sirena.org.uk> References: <1406728440-17837-1-git-send-email-ldewangan@nvidia.com> <1406728440-17837-2-git-send-email-ldewangan@nvidia.com> <20140730155302.GE20162@leverpostej> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GZ7IEjvh/SgTPveO" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140730155302.GE20162@leverpostej> X-Cookie: 98% lean. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 94.175.94.161 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: userspace-consumer: add DT binding details X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mezzanine.sirena.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --GZ7IEjvh/SgTPveO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 04:53:03PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 02:54:00PM +0100, Laxman Dewangan wrote: > > +Required properties: > > +- compatible : Must be "reg-userspace-consumer". > I would never expect to see "userspace" in a DT beinding string; this is > entirely a software abstraction description and has nothing to do with > the interaction of HW components. > Why do you think we need this in the DT? Yes, this is test code - it is not intended to be used in production. Any binding should be for the consumer using this, not for this implementation detail. --GZ7IEjvh/SgTPveO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIbBAEBAgAGBQJT2R/rAAoJELSic+t+oim91jwP+KsCYAJCp5Q84qu3Omi6J5Gv 98nf9V1Rshc/I2IaSdr9JYKMzbTN0ke5HJ81DK06bvXqw3Cz1ZIpoQrjJ5HOtBkf NdVd2iSqKWP9bSZ2m04C3WUPXpqtONNchfOGun10GGWcV4Y8q4sknbSsE5dLYD5L F45Lc2MnJt7VXCB7ISi3bGq7D6loOL8nkYzFK4AZSMAhEYklNCfaC2K+qZ3f7zvN 131dlaCNlKwf1B+XL8r9+007ZIaFWF6jsOOaWJlSGktupF2Qb5bMCVlqpUq5xsoH qKq/HDE+TFXasO/oMjGtQB+Br23IlhgeAehGFdaukp4InHqfatBc3Y0/tLOn/1As 8YdphlqKP0kvVDfNKJaK+Awd0bxzUlAUShInVnRTslsyqXOywowi1y7P3Ob45Ny9 L3P0Dmty1mc7UEGB2lKlpFgqFBKgpharud1u0oOJ3PElucRPDKotiIH8U4HBcqOj yVqWDhZJ3Sens9HQZGlGnUhau1nnuBEy9e1yz8EmGfL+xPg4xfe3r6XrRcyDsT7f IQrVTVqjub5+hU/oe+HK/B1EwjwkmHrIwYeU8QmF+6qsVgrRqSbgsVtkSh5BaiQx uPoc1AqIjNGpmXRCZXxj2Fm3J/1t8Jp17QLOJSoY9UbDDUV2UALh0mDCUqptPOA2 7/FNVjc1OVJ81UGgLAA= =nb21 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --GZ7IEjvh/SgTPveO--