From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755402AbaHAS1a (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Aug 2014 14:27:30 -0400 Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk ([106.187.55.193]:40433 "EHLO mezzanine.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751460AbaHAS12 (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Aug 2014 14:27:28 -0400 Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2014 19:26:56 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Jassi Brar Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ks.giri@samsung.com, arnd@arndb.de, ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, mark.rutland@arm.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, pawel.moll@arm.com, courtney.cavin@sonymobile.com, mporter@linaro.org, slapdau@yahoo.com.au, lftan.linux@gmail.com, loic.pallardy@st.com, s-anna@ti.com, ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org, bjorn@kryo.se, patches@linaro.org, mollie.wu@linaro.org, t.takinishi@jp.fujitsu.com, khilman@linaro.org, lee.jones@linaro.org, andy.green@linaro.org Message-ID: <20140801182656.GJ30458@sirena.org.uk> References: <1406896194-4667-1-git-send-email-jaswinder.singh@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="aRuUY7KzmetiZjaI" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1406896194-4667-1-git-send-email-jaswinder.singh@linaro.org> X-Cookie: You look tired. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 94.197.121.167 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCHv10 0/4] Common Mailbox Framework X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mezzanine.sirena.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --aRuUY7KzmetiZjaI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 05:59:54PM +0530, Jassi Brar wrote: > Hello, > Here's v10. Not much different from v9. The code and the generic > bindings looked good enough to relevant gods, but the patchset still > needs some formal loving in the form of Acked-by's. >=20 > Changes since v9: > o Purely cosmetic changes - added headers and used BIT()=20 Given that this code is now getting very stable can I suggest setting up a git tree and making sure it's included in -next? Just send Stephen a mail with a pointer to the relevant tree and branch and ask him to add it. I'd say it's probably worth merging at this point though since it's not been in -next yet and the merge window is likely to open this weekend it might be a bit much to try to merge it this window. --aRuUY7KzmetiZjaI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJT29vtAAoJELSic+t+oim9dA8P/A+FpIIsTly/rMkM4zGMh/v0 BYIZyAxSl1AcOaXx2W1LnbW46bWFjGn/6bADpa2l0J7VV4ia03dyk8p28YfvFq2v 65tOuNRAiqmqv9+BXVG/w4IMPRj7SpTYG9p6i/vz7GG2GKB/FFe2MaaGYzcWgbr1 TkOeXhinDuyvd4gQsg4f2GJI4djhY0KWnU41R02rMWZwBbVnfJSEqFbwo66XXboO Uvw1l9WCK56GqJVf6pR4tNSxqD+8fp9dpJXrdyaZ9Ul08atd2xpR4jyUraljSqAG fTar2Vy474LMh8aDfS8wEPXbf4AuEwq0PzUvBTY1/rJMT8g1kvURiJ3+h2ihKNAN 3EJ+rPEcsCmlB04BP3/Y2BF1HDNM/51uVbekF7xvOaTCK01N8MBfth4D38plm7Hh IqaVezfrSrgo5cz8/xssii4NFYbZGSKtVs6Z0oIZijME+YtEqQrLuAG2kRNdLzDR DANb7dtB3U848vn9hQaCJ5HPGYjHfS21O609oSAltwkXdx2xYh77McVn5AcKw5ax lvAa7wahag7Z40zSnZpFJV0bPD2TDKpZgFnDRWF07m24VGhnPLnY+HXFEG5BISaT bSOIXfPdsLsXEpmvnxIdl0ToavzW4TfQbeCL5RIPU++fjoOpbgvTMbO3ayAlfT0r dYZttikv27G4WqMPhNXl =xtYB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --aRuUY7KzmetiZjaI--