Re: [ANNOUNCE] scsi patch queue tree updated

[Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1256 bytes --]

Hi Christoph,

On Mon, 4 Aug 2014 04:34:04 -0700 Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 09:30:59PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > You realise that neither of these in linux-next as the scsi-core and
> > scsi-drivers trees had for-3.16 branches in the last round.  I assume I
> > should just drop these trees completely from linux-next?
> 
> Well, they get pulled in through James, so you can drop them for now.

Will do.

> I mostly put you on Cc so you could comment wether there are any hard
> rules on how long even those simple fixes should be in linux-next.  I
> know you've put up stats for a few of the last merge windows about
> patches that weren't in linux-next, so there's been some tracking of it
> for sure.

If they are simple, clear fixes, then maybe a day or two just for build
coverage, but it is very much up to the maintainer.  There are always a
few poatches that get through late (quote a few of which I suspect have
been "in train", just not yet published in the maintainer's tree).

And, of course, real fixes go in just about anytime ...

I don't think we believe in hard rules for anything :-)
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]