From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Bugfix 0/2] Fix bugs caused by "use irqdomain to dynamically allocate IRQ for IOAPIC"
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2014 13:58:02 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140805175802.GE27240@laptop.dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53E10136.9000505@linux.intel.com>
On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 12:07:18AM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
>
>
> On 2014/8/5 21:04, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 11:26:16AM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
> >> Two issues have been reported against patch set "use irqdomain to
> >> dynamically allocate IRQ for IOAPIC" at https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/6/9/44.
> >>
> >> This first one causes failure of suspend/hibernation, please refer to
> >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/7/28/822 for more information. And we have
> >> worked out a patch to fix it (https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/7/30/725) and
> >> Borislav has tested it. But with more testing and analysis, I found the
> >> provided patch still has some issues:
> >> 1) It may cause regression to Xen
> >
> > Could you elaborate please?
> >
> > Is there a git tree with all of these patches to test it?
> Hi Konrad,
> The patch at https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/7/30/725 skips invoking
> xen_pcifront_enable_irq() on resume from suspend or restore from
> hibernation. I'm not sure whether that will affect suspend/hibernation
> with Xen. This patch series won't affect Xen anymore.
Ah, it looks like:
415 pcibios_enable_irq = xen_pcifront_enable_irq;
416 pcibios_disable_irq = NULL;
Is the culprit right? If there was an pcibios_disable_irq set, then said
patch would not been needed?
> I have prepared a tree for you at
> https://github.com/jiangliu/linux.git suspend
Thank you. Will give it a spin tomorrow.
>
> Thanks for help!
> Gerry
>
> >> 2) Flag dev->dev.power.is_prepared has already been cleared when
> >> pcibios_enable_device() gets called, so it will cause IOAPIC pin
> >> reference count leak.
> >>
> >> So I reworked the patch to fix above issues. The first patch fixes issue
> >> 1 by moving check of dev->dev.power.is_prepared pcibios_enable_irq, so
> >> it won't affect Xen. The second patch fixes the IOAPIC pin reference
> >> count leakage issue. It also solves the issue we have discussed at
> >> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-pci/msg32902.html
> >>
> >> Regards!
> >> Gerry
> >>
> >> Jiang Liu (2):
> >> x86, irq, PCI: Keep IRQ assignment for PCI devices during
> >> suspend/hibernation
> >> x86, irq: Keep balance of IOAPIC pin reference count
> >>
> >> arch/x86/pci/intel_mid_pci.c | 9 ++++++++-
> >> arch/x86/pci/irq.c | 8 +++++++-
> >> drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
> >> include/linux/pci.h | 1 +
> >> 4 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> --
> >> 1.7.10.4
> >>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-05 17:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-05 3:26 Jiang Liu
2014-08-05 3:26 ` [Bugfix 1/2] x86, irq, PCI: Keep IRQ assignment for PCI devices during suspend/hibernation Jiang Liu
2014-08-05 18:37 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-08-06 10:22 ` Jiang Liu
2014-08-06 17:09 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-08-07 11:03 ` tip/x86/apic (was: Re: [Bugfix 1/2] x86, irq, PCI: Keep IRQ assignment for PCI devices during suspend/hibernation) Borislav Petkov
2014-08-07 11:33 ` [GIT PULL] x86/apic changes for v3.17 Ingo Molnar
2014-08-07 13:31 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-08-07 16:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-08-08 8:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-08-08 6:07 ` [Bugfix] x86, irq, PCI: Keep IRQ assignment for PCI devices during suspend/hibernation Jiang Liu
2014-08-08 9:19 ` [tip:x86/apic] " tip-bot for Jiang Liu
2014-08-08 22:21 ` [GIT PULL] x86/apic changes for v3.17 David Rientjes
2014-08-09 17:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-08-11 5:27 ` Jiang Liu
2014-08-05 3:26 ` [Bugfix 2/2] x86, irq: Keep balance of IOAPIC pin reference count Jiang Liu
2014-08-05 13:04 ` [Bugfix 0/2] Fix bugs caused by "use irqdomain to dynamically allocate IRQ for IOAPIC" Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-08-05 16:07 ` Jiang Liu
2014-08-05 17:58 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2014-08-06 10:27 ` Jiang Liu
2014-08-06 14:28 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140805175802.GE27240@laptop.dumpdata.com \
--to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jiang.liu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome