mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: <zoltan.kiss@citrix.com>, <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
	<Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>, <david.vrabel@citrix.com>,
	<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] xen-netback: Changes around carrier handling
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2014 01:00:59 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140806000059.GA7315@zion.uk.xensource.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140805.160748.1185917042908283028.davem@davemloft.net>

On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 04:07:48PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@citrix.com>
> Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2014 16:20:56 +0100
> 
> > This series starts using carrier off as a way to purge packets when the guest is
> > not able (or willing) to receive them. It is a much faster way to get rid of
> > packets waiting for an overwhelmed guest.
> > The first patch changes current netback code where it relies currently on
> > netif_carrier_ok.
> > The second turns off the carrier if the guest times out on a queue, and only
> > turn it on again if that queue (or queues) resurrects.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@citrix.com>
> > Signed-off-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
> 
> Applied, but I have some reservations:
> 

Wow, this is fast. I appreciate your speed, but there's still
outstanding issues in the series.

Apart from some comments on maintainability, the biggest problem is that
there's a bug in second patch that needs to be fixed; or I need to be
proved wrong.  We need to set aside some more time to get those
questions answered. I don't think this series is suitable to go in as
is.

DaveM, could you please advise how to deal with this situation?

Wei.

  reply	other threads:[~2014-08-06  0:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-04 15:20 Zoltan Kiss
2014-08-04 15:20 ` [PATCH net-next 1/2] xen-netback: Using a new state bit instead of carrier Zoltan Kiss
2014-08-05 12:45   ` Wei Liu
2014-08-06 18:25     ` Zoltan Kiss
2014-08-04 15:20 ` [PATCH net-next 2/2] xen-netback: Turn off the carrier if the guest is not able to receive Zoltan Kiss
2014-08-05 12:45   ` Wei Liu
2014-08-06 19:18     ` Zoltan Kiss
2014-08-04 15:34 ` [PATCH net-next 0/2] xen-netback: Changes around carrier handling Zoltan Kiss
2014-08-05 23:07 ` David Miller
2014-08-06  0:00   ` Wei Liu [this message]
2014-08-06  1:50     ` David Miller
2014-08-06  8:54       ` Wei Liu
2014-08-06 19:20   ` Zoltan Kiss
2014-08-06 21:01     ` David Miller
2014-08-07 15:51       ` Zoltan Kiss
2014-08-08  5:28         ` David Miller
2014-08-07 16:49   ` Zoltan Kiss
2014-08-08  5:29     ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140806000059.GA7315@zion.uk.xensource.com \
    --to=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
    --cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    --cc=zoltan.kiss@citrix.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome