From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753446AbaHFGG3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Aug 2014 02:06:29 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([103.22.144.67]:36229 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751127AbaHFGG2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Aug 2014 02:06:28 -0400 Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2014 16:06:08 +1000 From: Stephen Rothwell To: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Cc: Linus Torvalds , Linux Containers , , Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] namespace updates for v3.17-rc1 Message-ID: <20140806160608.218b6944@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <87lhr2tcyx.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> References: <87fvhav3ic.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <20140806144643.45e5dab8@canb.auug.org.au> <87lhr2tcyx.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.10.1 (GTK+ 2.24.24; i486-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/UDert/OUbJNSkXl1TZUQu.4"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --Sig_/UDert/OUbJNSkXl1TZUQu.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Eric, On Tue, 05 Aug 2014 22:16:06 -0700 ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman= ) wrote: > > I am not certain what your point is. I am just trying to give Linus a heads up for branches that have not had much exposure before he is asked to pull them. > There have been no commits added since the merge window opened. >=20 > There was one commit changed to fix a typo. I documented that already. Yes, that is what confused my, sorry, since that commit and the ones following are new commits but unchanged patches. > There were some commits pushed to the tree as late as friday that had > been out for review earlier than that and it is possible that you did > not pick them up in linux-next until monday. That doesn't mean I added > anything after the merge window opened. Correct. > I have also made certain all of these commits have at least had a chance > to show up in linux-next. >=20 > As for missing cool tags shrug. The people looking at my code didn't > feel like saying the magic words so I didn't include cool tags. Maybe you should push them ... these tags are not just "cool", they give less involved people some indications of what has happened in the life of a patch. > Beyond that I have been quite out of it recently and this is what I had > time to do. If I had had a little more time and energy I would have > included unmount on unlink patches that still need magic to happen to > keep from blowing the stack in pathological cases on everything except > x86_64. That code has been sitting in linux-next. >=20 > Which is a my long winded way of say it sounds like you are accusing me > of being irresponsible, and my way of saying that I have tested and I did not mean to accuse, there are reasons (as you have pointed out) that things get added late, or rewritten. --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au --Sig_/UDert/OUbJNSkXl1TZUQu.4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJT4cXeAAoJEMDTa8Ir7ZwVZSoP/0g+Wm1niCnsxXZ4PEBpN9LX APPokAEis+gA2gL8PIhc+AbijkGi/VCr6wiY/tzM59luPRL627Va0gK6m2nRhYPO 7yYmk62mDPdN202CE7NZaNsupXTsdPDgs1sKGrzBSaeghD1v9V51jiEPGDyLt9oS mB9Zx/CFnCaNrWJYIGsT38FpfB7dbookmPwo0kHpSqitv1YUdxqFHcLR1zkBlLsK JpnRLGP21FYotdrqM16XpzHcyGXE1TicsAwQ3KFm4gucRVkas+39oBk1LA3ZZNtL hT5yDhDQffvR/R2QwdfvAzjfMEGuNFZJRduUG0rJDzl3uSbxSCsfZtBQMPhMMfhs 9EiSbMdu5uT45uw4RbB55y36QcK8+5DErAKtCM1XW9D1zLCk+vmkMvzWjzmg49/y ldemUoDAxf6NsC33d8EyH3sOYys6hD4/2y9goVheBEKPOzLjfS4+q2LodygvEEyG l5UZdEVQURoseDRMRW+y6Un9MLhm7BJjF81NVqKgh0BhMFXPqD5sdAJT834YNohk 3Wbo5wAUpnB/0dRPmSLVB+gq6gd3FOJkGXs9niMV2gFmMjtKWQg7g4r14pPeNGTN bJrwfjmt7+8I5ajQhzZqGRXG+k7VaRv71BuOFJOpspC3CVIoXtlMbmQ1dHyq7sNX IEOBvhLcGeCtbubASXAD =Mdkb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/UDert/OUbJNSkXl1TZUQu.4--