From: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: alex.shi@intel.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
peterz@infradead.org, pjt@google.com, efault@gmx.de,
rjw@rjwysocki.net, morten.rasmussen@arm.com,
svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com, arjan@linux.intel.com,
mingo@kernel.org
Cc: nicolas.pitre@linaro.org, len.brown@intel.com,
yuyang.du@intel.com, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org,
daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, corbet@lwn.net,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, markgross@thegnar.org,
sundar.iyer@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com,
mike.turquette@linaro.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: [RFC PATCH V2 11/19] sched: add power aware scheduling in fork/exec/wake
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 17:08:05 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140811113755.31956.11197.stgit@preeti.in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140811113000.31956.52857.stgit@preeti.in.ibm.com>
From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
This patch add power aware scheduling in fork/exec/wake. It try to
select cpu from the busiest while still has utilization group. That's
will save power since it leaves more groups idle in system.
The trade off is adding a power aware statistics collection in group
seeking. But since the collection just happened in power scheduling
eligible condition, the worst case of hackbench testing just drops
about 2% with powersaving policy. No clear change for performance
policy.
The main function in this patch is get_cpu_for_power_policy(), that
will try to get a idlest cpu from the busiest while still has
utilization group, if the system is using power aware policy and
has such group.
Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
[Added CONFIG_SCHED_POWER switch to enable this patch]
Signed-off-by: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 117 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 114 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 20e2414..e993f1c 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -4600,6 +4600,103 @@ struct sd_lb_stats {
#endif
};
+#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_POWER
+/*
+ * Try to collect the task running number and capacity of the group.
+ */
+static void get_sg_power_stats(struct sched_group *group,
+ struct sched_domain *sd, struct sg_lb_stats *sgs)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ for_each_cpu(i, sched_group_cpus(group))
+ sgs->group_util += max_rq_util(i);
+
+ sgs->group_weight = group->group_weight;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Is this domain full of utilization with the task?
+ */
+static int is_sd_full(struct sched_domain *sd,
+ struct task_struct *p, struct sd_lb_stats *sds)
+{
+ struct sched_group *group;
+ struct sg_lb_stats sgs;
+ long sd_min_delta = LONG_MAX;
+ unsigned int putil;
+
+ if (p->se.load.weight == p->se.avg.load_avg_contrib)
+ /* p maybe a new forked task */
+ putil = FULL_UTIL;
+ else
+ putil = (u64)(p->se.avg.runnable_avg_sum << SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT)
+ / (p->se.avg.runnable_avg_period + 1);
+
+ /* Try to collect the domain's utilization */
+ group = sd->groups;
+ do {
+ long g_delta;
+
+ memset(&sgs, 0, sizeof(sgs));
+ get_sg_power_stats(group, sd, &sgs);
+
+ g_delta = sgs.group_weight * FULL_UTIL - sgs.group_util;
+
+ if (g_delta > 0 && g_delta < sd_min_delta) {
+ sd_min_delta = g_delta;
+ sds->group_leader = group;
+ }
+
+ sds->sd_util += sgs.group_util;
+ } while (group = group->next, group != sd->groups);
+
+ if (sds->sd_util + putil < sd->span_weight * FULL_UTIL)
+ return 0;
+
+ /* can not hold one more task in this domain */
+ return 1;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Execute power policy if this domain is not full.
+ */
+static inline int get_sd_sched_balance_policy(struct sched_domain *sd,
+ int cpu, struct task_struct *p, struct sd_lb_stats *sds)
+{
+ if (sched_balance_policy == SCHED_POLICY_PERFORMANCE)
+ return SCHED_POLICY_PERFORMANCE;
+
+ memset(sds, 0, sizeof(*sds));
+ if (is_sd_full(sd, p, sds))
+ return SCHED_POLICY_PERFORMANCE;
+ return sched_balance_policy;
+}
+
+/*
+ * If power policy is eligible for this domain, and it has task allowed cpu.
+ * we will select CPU from this domain.
+ */
+static int get_cpu_for_power_policy(struct sched_domain *sd, int cpu,
+ struct task_struct *p, struct sd_lb_stats *sds)
+{
+ int policy;
+ int new_cpu = -1;
+
+ policy = get_sd_sched_balance_policy(sd, cpu, p, sds);
+ if (policy != SCHED_POLICY_PERFORMANCE && sds->group_leader)
+ new_cpu = find_idlest_cpu(sds->group_leader, p, cpu);
+
+ return new_cpu;
+}
+#else
+static int get_cpu_for_power_policy(struct sched_domain *sd, int cpu,
+ struct task_struct *p, struct sd_lb_stats *sds)
+{
+ return -1;
+}
+#endif /* CONFIG_SCHED_POWER */
+
/*
* select_task_rq_fair: Select target runqueue for the waking task in domains
* that have the 'sd_flag' flag set. In practice, this is SD_BALANCE_WAKE,
@@ -4608,6 +4705,9 @@ struct sd_lb_stats {
* Balances load by selecting the idlest cpu in the idlest group, or under
* certain conditions an idle sibling cpu if the domain has SD_WAKE_AFFINE set.
*
+ * If CONFIG_SCHED_POWER is set and SCHED_POLICY_POWERSAVE is enabled, the power
+ * aware scheduler kicks in. It returns a cpu appropriate for power savings.
+ *
* Returns the target cpu number.
*
* preempt must be disabled.
@@ -4620,6 +4720,7 @@ select_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu, int sd_flag, int wake_f
int new_cpu = cpu;
int want_affine = 0;
int sync = wake_flags & WF_SYNC;
+ struct sd_lb_stats sds;
if (p->nr_cpus_allowed == 1)
return prev_cpu;
@@ -4645,12 +4746,22 @@ select_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu, int sd_flag, int wake_f
break;
}
- if (tmp->flags & sd_flag)
+ if (tmp->flags & sd_flag) {
sd = tmp;
+
+ new_cpu = get_cpu_for_power_policy(sd, cpu, p, &sds);
+ if (new_cpu != -1)
+ goto unlock;
+ }
}
+ if (affine_sd) {
+ new_cpu = get_cpu_for_power_policy(affine_sd, cpu, p, &sds);
+ if (new_cpu != -1)
+ goto unlock;
- if (affine_sd && cpu != prev_cpu && wake_affine(affine_sd, p, sync))
- prev_cpu = cpu;
+ if (cpu != prev_cpu && wake_affine(affine_sd, p, sync))
+ prev_cpu = cpu;
+ }
if (sd_flag & SD_BALANCE_WAKE) {
new_cpu = select_idle_sibling(p, prev_cpu);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-11 11:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-11 11:31 [RFC PATCH V2 00/19] Power Scheduler Design Preeti U Murthy
2014-08-11 11:32 ` [RFC PATCH V2 01/19] sched/power: Remove cpu idle state selection and cpu frequency tuning Preeti U Murthy
2014-08-18 15:39 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-08-18 17:26 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-08-18 17:53 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-08-11 11:33 ` [RFC PATCH V2 02/19] sched/power: Move idle state selection into the scheduler Preeti U Murthy
2014-08-18 15:54 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-08-18 17:19 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-08-18 18:25 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-08-11 11:33 ` [RFC PATCH V2 03/19] sched/idle: Enumerate idle states in scheduler topology Preeti U Murthy
2014-08-11 11:34 ` [RFC PATCH V2 04/19] sched: add sched balance policies in kernel Preeti U Murthy
2014-08-11 11:34 ` [RFC PATCH V2 05/19] sched: add sysfs interface for sched_balance_policy selection Preeti U Murthy
2014-08-11 11:35 ` [RFC PATCH V2 06/19] sched: log the cpu utilization at rq Preeti U Murthy
2014-08-11 11:35 ` [RFC PATCH V2 07/19] sched: add new sg/sd_lb_stats fields for incoming fork/exec/wake balancing Preeti U Murthy
2014-08-11 11:36 ` [RFC PATCH V2 08/19] sched: move sg/sd_lb_stats struct ahead Preeti U Murthy
2014-08-11 11:36 ` [RFC PATCH V2 09/19] sched: get rq potential maximum utilization Preeti U Murthy
2014-08-11 11:37 ` [RFC PATCH V2 10/19] sched: detect wakeup burst with rq->avg_idle Preeti U Murthy
2014-08-11 11:38 ` Preeti U Murthy [this message]
2014-08-11 11:38 ` [RFC PATCH V2 12/19] sched: using avg_idle to detect bursty wakeup Preeti U Murthy
2014-08-11 11:39 ` [RFC PATCH V2 13/19] sched: packing transitory tasks in wakeup power balancing Preeti U Murthy
2014-08-11 11:39 ` [RFC PATCH V2 14/19] sched: add power/performance balance allow flag Preeti U Murthy
2014-08-11 11:40 ` [RFC PATCH V2 15/19] sched: pull all tasks from source grp and no balance for prefer_sibling Preeti U Murthy
2014-08-11 11:41 ` [RFC PATCH V2 16/19] sched: add new members of sd_lb_stats Preeti U Murthy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140811113755.31956.11197.stgit@preeti.in.ibm.com \
--to=preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex.shi@intel.com \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=markgross@thegnar.org \
--cc=mike.turquette@linaro.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=sundar.iyer@intel.com \
--cc=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=yuyang.du@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®