From: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
To: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, arm@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Matt Porter <mporter@linaro.org>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
robherring2@gmail.com, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
Marc Carino <marc.ceeeee@gmail.com>,
Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 2/7] ARM: SoC platform changes for 3.17
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 12:51:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140811195137.GB3711@ld-irv-0074> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1407516479-1251-3-git-send-email-olof@lixom.net>
+ other involved parties
On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 09:47:54AM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
> This is the bulk of new SoC enablement and other platform changes for 3.17:
[...]
> * Broadcom BCM7xxx settop box chipset is introduced
[...]
> Marc Carino (1):
> ARM: brcmstb: add infrastructure for ARM-based Broadcom STB SoCs
I realize this is a bit late (the pull request is already merged), but
I'd like to be up-front about this: there were some (late) oustanding
review comments made on this patch [1]. I have a few patches queued
locally for addressing many of them, but not all of the issues are
completely resolved.
Shall I simply send a revert patch for the
arch/arm/mach-bcm/platsmp-brcmstb.c stuff, and get it in through the
bcm -> arm-soc -> Linus merge path in 3.17-rcX? Or should I take the
incremental improvement approach, as we have functioning code with no
clear alternative proposal yet?
Again, sorry for the late noise.
Brian
[1] version 8 patch:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/343391
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-11 19:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-08 16:47 [GIT PULL 0/7] ARM: SoC " Olof Johansson
2014-08-08 16:47 ` [GIT PULL 1/7] ARM: SoC cleanups " Olof Johansson
2014-08-08 16:47 ` [GIT PULL 2/7] ARM: SoC platform changes " Olof Johansson
2014-08-11 19:51 ` Brian Norris [this message]
2014-08-11 20:35 ` Olof Johansson
2014-08-08 16:47 ` [GIT PULL 3/7] ARM: SoC board " Olof Johansson
2014-08-08 16:47 ` [GIT PULL 4/7] ARM: SoC device-tree " Olof Johansson
2014-08-08 16:47 ` [GIT PULL 5/7] .17 ARM: SoC driver " Olof Johansson
2014-08-08 18:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-08-08 20:34 ` Olof Johansson
2014-08-08 16:47 ` [GIT PATCH 6/7] phy: fix up for devm_phy_create api change Olof Johansson
2014-08-08 16:47 ` [GIT PULL 7/7] ARM: SoC defconfig updates for 3.17 Olof Johansson
2014-08-08 20:03 ` [GIT PULL 0/7] ARM: SoC changes " Rob Herring
2014-08-08 20:37 ` Olof Johansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140811195137.GB3711@ld-irv-0074 \
--to=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=arm@kernel.org \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=gregory.0xf0@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=marc.ceeeee@gmail.com \
--cc=mporter@linaro.org \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=robherring2@gmail.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®