From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754144AbaHLIDw (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Aug 2014 04:03:52 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:16805 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753386AbaHLIDs (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Aug 2014 04:03:48 -0400 Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 09:11:16 +0100 From: Alexander Gordeev To: James Smart Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND 12/23] lpfc: Use pci_enable_msix_range() instead of pci_enable_msix() Message-ID: <20140812081115.GA1674@agordeev.usersys.redhat.com> References: <20140726082227.GF21129@agordeev.usersys.redhat.com> <20140811080148.GG16504@dhcp-27-160.brq.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 01:14:54PM -0400, James Smart wrote: > Alexander, > > I haven't looked too deeply, but it's clear it doesn't jive with what we've > discussed in the past. Your original patches missed several other similar > sections for revision. I had sent a revised set of patches. > > I was also unclear as to the merge path the patches were taking, as it was > mod'ing areas that have already changed in the scsi misc tree, but the misc > tree didn' have the pci mods. I take it this is heading to Christoph's tree > ? and that it has picked up the pci mods ? James, I lost the context and not sure what PCI modifications you are referring :( I will send a patch that combines your version shortly. Thanks! > -- james s -- Regards, Alexander Gordeev agordeev@redhat.com