From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755111AbaHLV2S (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Aug 2014 17:28:18 -0400 Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk ([106.187.55.193]:60454 "EHLO mezzanine.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751368AbaHLV2Q (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Aug 2014 17:28:16 -0400 Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 22:27:57 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Javier Martinez Canillas Cc: Kukjin Kim , Doug Anderson , Olof Johansson , Yuvaraj Kumar C D , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20140812212757.GY17528@sirena.org.uk> References: <1407861868-20097-1-git-send-email-javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk> <1407861868-20097-7-git-send-email-javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk> <20140812172552.GU17528@sirena.org.uk> <53EA61B9.2070805@collabora.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UU1ixziQytOgr6B7" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <53EA61B9.2070805@collabora.co.uk> X-Cookie: 98% lean. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 94.175.94.161 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] ARM: dts: Add tps65090 FETs constraints X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mezzanine.sirena.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --UU1ixziQytOgr6B7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 08:49:29PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > So, is adding these voltages ranges (the design limits) in the Peach Pit = DTS > file directly an acceptable solution? Basically what my previous patch [0= ] did. > That matches what is in the board schematic so I assume that it's safe to= use > these voltage ranges for that machine. If so I'll drop this series and re= post > that patch fixing the typo error and commit message pointed by Doug that = were > already addressed in $subject. Well, I think the question is if you understand where those numbers come =66rom and if they make sense. I've not seen the schematic for the board so I can't comment but it is quite unusual to see ranges listed for so many supplies, for things like SD it's obviously normal but things like video_mid are a bit more surprising. Does anything actually vary those voltages? The change where you fix up the supply mappings still makes sense of course. --UU1ixziQytOgr6B7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJT6obaAAoJELSic+t+oim909kP/1okMQECkjemzwIec4io27fl qYZJEBgB9Jsm6J1k2iko77mU6fkQVoLJPbXKXhY1n7TecUbb7uPIcoYfAeVSTdKR AI0jwaOZTyWbPf87/UIiW6WUIgzRmp5Ckit6FsQFm0bQkfIRJgF6NCYsx8KAOEEX w90F0tncP0DkS6Z3lYaXwp9WL5G7STWJRopHjhYxTSXOeD/Uhu41PsIJ/aDHlnMi 2JiyoBzVX3fGRxfa6uLAxPNUBXTVGtQUreet+HcQRZmnXRkXTgb0wluQ3o6gG0qj bh5JipFtjQ0v/d6ivPqaS9UraEF+Po8qW37Lswpv102xwmEViQpQIPqCcRRl1x6i 0EDJdXczVBKH6YJWHuoswPuMrLIJ1I0OqPWaIQTVfx1v9DXgTpHBZYyzPLGf9KRs fmq6S1mNgYHnhMlapp2VbSWsH9PHlVKPbVrcSmVWQx67QaFg1C23z50lTUh82zxK nPM5ET3fYkxs0RbYbrNw5eAKO6SdYswBggD9ciMDL1pyo12+qEoNX3/SFzPlSnjz ppO82J4GImONl3FuuiXw9GY0I9IGjGcIeL7bUZ9JQNno+wyG29lpuii4xLft3yMD i63dM6Q76/VR3JYDotQabSaj4U/U4s2Y+8OJjLjvRIc0jAQE7jA4E7ef3tfgGWp6 gtaPrvtN6bi4xxWUvq6j =XQWs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --UU1ixziQytOgr6B7--