mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Frank Mayhar <fmayhar@google.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Sanjay Rao <srao@redhat.com>, Larry Woodman <lwoodman@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC] time,signal: protect resource use statistics with seqlock
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 17:03:37 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140813170337.7f2b225a@cuia.bos.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140813184511.GA9663@redhat.com>

On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 20:45:11 +0200
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:

> That said, it is not that I am really sure that seqcount_t in ->signal
> is actually worse, not to mention that this is subjective anyway. IOW,
> I am not going to really fight with your approach ;)

This is what it looks like, on top of your for_each_thread series
from yesterday:

---8<---

Subject: time,signal: protect resource use statistics with seqlock

Both times() and clock_gettime(CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID) have scalability
issues on large systems, due to both functions being serialized with a
lock.

The lock protects against reporting a wrong value, due to a thread in the
task group exiting, its statistics reporting up to the signal struct, and
that exited task's statistics being counted twice (or not at all).

Protecting that with a lock results in times and clock_gettime being
completely serialized on large systems.

This can be fixed by using a seqlock around the events that gather and
propagate statistics. As an additional benefit, the protection code can
be moved into thread_group_cputime, slightly simplifying the calling
functions.

In the case of posix_cpu_clock_get_task things can be simplified a
lot, because the calling function already ensures tsk sticks around,
and the rest is now taken care of in thread_group_cputime.

This way the statistics reporting code can run lockless.

Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
---
 include/linux/sched.h          |  1 +
 kernel/exit.c                  |  4 ++++
 kernel/fork.c                  |  1 +
 kernel/sched/cputime.c         | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 kernel/sys.c                   |  2 --
 kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c | 14 --------------
 6 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 857ba40..91f9209 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -646,6 +646,7 @@ struct signal_struct {
 	 * Live threads maintain their own counters and add to these
 	 * in __exit_signal, except for the group leader.
 	 */
+	seqlock_t stats_lock;
 	cputime_t utime, stime, cutime, cstime;
 	cputime_t gtime;
 	cputime_t cgtime;
diff --git a/kernel/exit.c b/kernel/exit.c
index 32c58f7..8092e59 100644
--- a/kernel/exit.c
+++ b/kernel/exit.c
@@ -126,6 +126,7 @@ static void __exit_signal(struct task_struct *tsk)
 		 * will have been the last reference on the signal_struct.
 		 */
 		task_cputime(tsk, &utime, &stime);
+		write_seqlock(&sig->stats_lock);
 		sig->utime += utime;
 		sig->stime += stime;
 		sig->gtime += task_gtime(tsk);
@@ -137,6 +138,7 @@ static void __exit_signal(struct task_struct *tsk)
 		sig->oublock += task_io_get_oublock(tsk);
 		task_io_accounting_add(&sig->ioac, &tsk->ioac);
 		sig->sum_sched_runtime += tsk->se.sum_exec_runtime;
+		write_sequnlock(&sig->stats_lock);
 	}
 
 	sig->nr_threads--;
@@ -1043,6 +1045,7 @@ static int wait_task_zombie(struct wait_opts *wo, struct task_struct *p)
 		spin_lock_irq(&p->real_parent->sighand->siglock);
 		psig = p->real_parent->signal;
 		sig = p->signal;
+		write_seqlock(&psig->stats_lock);
 		psig->cutime += tgutime + sig->cutime;
 		psig->cstime += tgstime + sig->cstime;
 		psig->cgtime += task_gtime(p) + sig->gtime + sig->cgtime;
@@ -1065,6 +1068,7 @@ static int wait_task_zombie(struct wait_opts *wo, struct task_struct *p)
 			psig->cmaxrss = maxrss;
 		task_io_accounting_add(&psig->ioac, &p->ioac);
 		task_io_accounting_add(&psig->ioac, &sig->ioac);
+		write_sequnlock(&psig->stats_lock);
 		spin_unlock_irq(&p->real_parent->sighand->siglock);
 	}
 
diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
index 1380d8a..5d7cf2b 100644
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -1068,6 +1068,7 @@ static int copy_signal(unsigned long clone_flags, struct task_struct *tsk)
 	sig->curr_target = tsk;
 	init_sigpending(&sig->shared_pending);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sig->posix_timers);
+	seqlock_init(&sig->stats_lock);
 
 	hrtimer_init(&sig->real_timer, CLOCK_MONOTONIC, HRTIMER_MODE_REL);
 	sig->real_timer.function = it_real_fn;
diff --git a/kernel/sched/cputime.c b/kernel/sched/cputime.c
index 3e52836..b5f1c58 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cputime.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cputime.c
@@ -288,18 +288,31 @@ void thread_group_cputime(struct task_struct *tsk, struct task_cputime *times)
 	struct signal_struct *sig = tsk->signal;
 	cputime_t utime, stime;
 	struct task_struct *t;
-
-	times->utime = sig->utime;
-	times->stime = sig->stime;
-	times->sum_exec_runtime = sig->sum_sched_runtime;
+	unsigned int seq, nextseq;
 
 	rcu_read_lock();
-	for_each_thread(tsk, t) {
-		task_cputime(t, &utime, &stime);
-		times->utime += utime;
-		times->stime += stime;
-		times->sum_exec_runtime += task_sched_runtime(t);
-	}
+	/* Attempt a lockless read on the first round. */
+	nextseq = 0;
+	do {
+		seq = nextseq;
+		read_seqbegin_or_lock(&sig->stats_lock, &seq);
+		times->utime = sig->utime;
+		times->stime = sig->stime;
+		times->sum_exec_runtime = sig->sum_sched_runtime;
+
+		for_each_thread(tsk, t) {
+			task_cputime(t, &utime, &stime);
+			times->utime += utime;
+			times->stime += stime;
+			times->sum_exec_runtime += task_sched_runtime(t);
+		}
+		/*
+		 * If a writer is currently active, seq will be odd, and
+		 * read_seqbegin_or_lock will take the lock.
+		 */
+		nextseq = raw_read_seqcount(&sig->stats_lock.seqcount);
+	} while (need_seqretry(&sig->stats_lock, seq));
+	done_seqretry(&sig->stats_lock, seq);
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 }
 
@@ -611,9 +624,6 @@ void task_cputime_adjusted(struct task_struct *p, cputime_t *ut, cputime_t *st)
 	cputime_adjust(&cputime, &p->prev_cputime, ut, st);
 }
 
-/*
- * Must be called with siglock held.
- */
 void thread_group_cputime_adjusted(struct task_struct *p, cputime_t *ut, cputime_t *st)
 {
 	struct task_cputime cputime;
diff --git a/kernel/sys.c b/kernel/sys.c
index ce81291..b663664 100644
--- a/kernel/sys.c
+++ b/kernel/sys.c
@@ -862,11 +862,9 @@ void do_sys_times(struct tms *tms)
 {
 	cputime_t tgutime, tgstime, cutime, cstime;
 
-	spin_lock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
 	thread_group_cputime_adjusted(current, &tgutime, &tgstime);
 	cutime = current->signal->cutime;
 	cstime = current->signal->cstime;
-	spin_unlock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
 	tms->tms_utime = cputime_to_clock_t(tgutime);
 	tms->tms_stime = cputime_to_clock_t(tgstime);
 	tms->tms_cutime = cputime_to_clock_t(cutime);
diff --git a/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c b/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
index 3b89464..492b986 100644
--- a/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
+++ b/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
@@ -272,22 +272,8 @@ static int posix_cpu_clock_get_task(struct task_struct *tsk,
 		if (same_thread_group(tsk, current))
 			err = cpu_clock_sample(which_clock, tsk, &rtn);
 	} else {
-		unsigned long flags;
-		struct sighand_struct *sighand;
-
-		/*
-		 * while_each_thread() is not yet entirely RCU safe,
-		 * keep locking the group while sampling process
-		 * clock for now.
-		 */
-		sighand = lock_task_sighand(tsk, &flags);
-		if (!sighand)
-			return err;
-
 		if (tsk == current || thread_group_leader(tsk))
 			err = cpu_clock_sample_group(which_clock, tsk, &rtn);
-
-		unlock_task_sighand(tsk, &flags);
 	}
 
 	if (!err)

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-08-13 21:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-12 18:25 [PATCH RFC] time: drop do_sys_times spinlock Rik van Riel
2014-08-12 19:12 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-12 19:22   ` Rik van Riel
2014-08-12 22:27   ` Rik van Riel
2014-08-13 17:22     ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-13 17:35       ` Rik van Riel
2014-08-13 18:08         ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-13 18:25           ` Rik van Riel
2014-08-13 18:45             ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-13 18:57               ` Rik van Riel
2014-08-13 21:03               ` [PATCH RFC] time,signal: protect resource use statistics with seqlock Rik van Riel
2014-08-14  0:43                 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-08-14  1:57                   ` Rik van Riel
2014-08-14 13:34                     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-08-14 14:39                       ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-15  2:52                         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-08-15 14:26                           ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-15 22:33                             ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-08-14 13:22                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-14 13:38                   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-08-14 13:53                     ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-14 17:48                   ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-14 18:34                     ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-15  5:19                     ` Mike Galbraith
2014-08-15  6:28                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-15  9:37                         ` Mike Galbraith
2014-08-15  9:44                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-15 16:36                         ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-15 16:49                           ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-15 17:25                             ` Rik van Riel
2014-08-15 18:36                               ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-14 14:24                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-14 15:37                   ` Rik van Riel
2014-08-14 16:12                     ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-14 17:36                       ` Rik van Riel
2014-08-14 18:15                         ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-14 19:03                           ` Rik van Riel
2014-08-14 19:37                             ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-15  2:14                       ` Rik van Riel
2014-08-15 14:58                         ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-13 21:03               ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2014-08-13 17:40       ` [PATCH RFC] time: drop do_sys_times spinlock Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-13 17:50         ` Rik van Riel
2014-08-13 17:53           ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-13  6:59   ` Mike Galbraith
2014-08-13 11:11     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-13 13:24       ` Rik van Riel
2014-08-13 13:39         ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-13 14:09           ` Mike Galbraith

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140813170337.7f2b225a@cuia.bos.redhat.com \
    --to=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=fmayhar@google.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lwoodman@redhat.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=srao@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®