From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752307AbaHMTUc (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Aug 2014 15:20:32 -0400 Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk ([106.187.55.193]:33860 "EHLO mezzanine.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751765AbaHMTUb (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Aug 2014 15:20:31 -0400 Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 20:20:10 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: "Kweh, Hock Leong" Cc: Mika Westerberg , Darren Hart , Andrea Adami , "Chew, Chiau Ee" , Russell King , "chiauee85@gmail.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Haojian Zhuang , "linux-spi@vger.kernel.org" , Eric Miao , linux-arm-kernel Message-ID: <20140813192010.GK17528@sirena.org.uk> References: <1406221854-12828-1-git-send-email-chiau.ee.chew@intel.com> <20140725053230.GT1857@lahna.fi.intel.com> <20140729185529.GG17528@sirena.org.uk> <20140807084302.GO1657@lahna.fi.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="8cTeRMyFge1VYXV6" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Cookie: 98% lean. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 94.175.94.161 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] spi/pxa2xx-pci: Add common clock framework support in PCI glue layer X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mezzanine.sirena.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --8cTeRMyFge1VYXV6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 11:59:14AM +0000, Kweh, Hock Leong wrote: > > Any idea what happened to this patch? I didn't find it in linux-next an= d it > > looks like it is not merged with mainline either. > Would like to follow up with you about this patch. Do you have plan to me= rge it in ? >=20 Please don't send contentless pings, it just adds to the amount of mail that needs reading. Since I don't want to encourage people to do this I tend to respond to contentless pings by delaying things, otherwise I might give the impression that it's a good idea (and the "oh, I did something with that" that comes from deleting the nag makes that happen subconsciously anyway). Please also allow a reasonable time for review, less than two weeks (to when Mika first nagged) is a bit aggressive for something that isn't an urgent bug fix. People might take vacation or just be busy. --8cTeRMyFge1VYXV6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJT67pnAAoJELSic+t+oim9mhEP/R5JaZgRiycTgcIbOF32SYT0 JuJ9ijgqonbHay+jryJ25jSVFHzPgihcKQFEAc9ERmsPsFuhbeyJKiZP0e+65TFm nknUPUkLt7+1tCbcoAyFwHa1qWNMdvOFIiVVkLJCVRjoWYw1aNn3eoQOhvv7uB/n 2sh46zBsVwuT3vCv3Eqj9Sfs0ehGiDV96JGUYr52quqfeX72IRcVLjX/wkedTNG6 TjXyyfR5ISIQIzHT2kw6yX896mmNgiAF5IpGmqnir0spCK/MucXk089Z0RQfHN5+ Z1rS8Zl507boRD0rqRRbqVR6tAV8Yy81dw/13sSEbCNaU1VLepeQpfMiyMMAqPhj uZGNEkCHlRTA9F5fFBnkP7jZBfGV3sKEaTyS/2o6dEkhplQ/B2tT8vUsHXXXjHvL LSMkYQUNun7sCxgGNXkQxMEni3gWtD559WYyJu6heLgyzBpRSIE8SUWzbyAetKWp FPE5RUUdyy4R8E677JPbflU0nByJ5MeUM6Fe0Xj1f8n638MWqaSxjrICwsWsuomb R7hI0oNwA0YlxjSIZKjdeupEsMrBeKEupL6jBeADe3M/WZQLh5AdS3YEcN/mEUmU IT4vmXDvA2FOYtaAeutcuEC6KVgZKNZMgZ2/sSrmLSPL9tzAv/ZSw0JUzDld7GER 7XQ1Ic9A0dl726UoNxK9 =fiad -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --8cTeRMyFge1VYXV6--