mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@ubuntu.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Linux Containers <containers@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
	Kenton Varda <kenton@sandstorm.io>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: Remove implicit nodev for new mounts in non-root userns
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2014 19:37:47 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140815193746.GE11476@ubuntumail> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrVKq1Fxnsd9jKDi5_fcKfCJxBZ1w-zGXD3FR-pF-jLsmQ@mail.gmail.com>

Quoting Andy Lutomirski (luto@amacapital.net):
> On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@ubuntu.com> wrote:
> > Quoting Andy Lutomirski (luto@amacapital.net):
> >> Currently, creating a new mount (as opposed to bindmount) in a
> >> non-root userns will implicitly set nodev unless the fs is devpts.
> >> Something like this will be necessary for file systems that allow
> >> the mounter to create device nodes without using mknod (e.g. FUSE
> >> if/when that is allowed), but none of the currently allowed
> >> filesystems do this.
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Sorry, I'm probably thinking stupidly, but I don't see this restriction
> > being the case
> >
> > serge@sl:~$ mount | grep tmp
> > [...]
> > tmpfs on /run type tmpfs (rw,noexec,nosuid,size=10%,mode=0755)
> > serge@sl:~$ sudo mknod /run/kvm c 10 232
> > [sudo] password for serge:
> > serge@sl:~$ echo $?
> > 0
> > serge@sl:~$ ls -l /run/kvm
> > crw-r--r-- 1 root root 10, 232 Aug 15 14:04 /run/kvm
> >
> > But you seem to be saying I shouldn't be allowed to create a device inside
> > a tmpfs.  What am I overlooking?
> 
> I assume you're in the root userns.  This patch is unnecessary, and
> has no effect, if you're in the root userns.

Right, but I thought you were justifying adding FS_USERNS_DEV_MOUNT by saying
that you cannot mknod in those filesystems.  But I see you actually said
"without using mknod".  I guess I don't understand that caveat.

-serge

  reply	other threads:[~2014-08-15 19:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-06  0:57 [GIT PULL] namespace updates for v3.17-rc1 Eric W. Biederman
2014-08-06  4:46 ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-08-06  5:16   ` Eric W. Biederman
2014-08-06  6:06     ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-08-06  6:30       ` Eric W. Biederman
2014-08-07 13:28       ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-08-13  2:46 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-08-13  4:17   ` Eric W. Biederman
2014-08-13  4:38     ` Andy Lutomirski
     [not found]     ` <CAOP=4widH1rMZ1O=hzAT+M_8exdzRPA8pJ+wH29AQ9L0ogu9nw@mail.gmail.com>
2014-08-13 10:24       ` Eric W. Biederman
2014-08-13 17:03         ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-08-14  0:03           ` [PATCH] fs: Remove implicit nodev for new mounts in non-root userns Andy Lutomirski
2014-08-15 19:05             ` Serge Hallyn
2014-08-15 19:16               ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-08-15 19:37                 ` Serge Hallyn [this message]
2014-08-15 19:56                   ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-08-15 20:16                     ` Serge Hallyn
2014-08-15 20:16             ` Serge Hallyn
2014-08-28  1:35             ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-08-15 18:41         ` [GIT PULL] namespace updates for v3.17-rc1 Andy Lutomirski
2014-08-20 15:06 ` Richard Weinberger
2014-08-21  4:53   ` Eric W. Biederman
2014-08-21  6:29     ` Richard Weinberger
2014-08-21  7:24       ` Richard Weinberger
2014-08-21 13:54         ` Eric W. Biederman
2014-08-21 13:12     ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-08-21 13:22       ` Richard Weinberger
2014-08-21 14:09         ` Eric W. Biederman
2014-09-03 21:18           ` Richard Weinberger
2014-11-25 23:15           ` Richard Weinberger
2014-11-29 16:58             ` Richard Weinberger
2014-08-21 13:43       ` Eric W. Biederman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140815193746.GE11476@ubuntumail \
    --to=serge.hallyn@ubuntu.com \
    --cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=kenton@sandstorm.io \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®