From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751805AbaHRBch (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Aug 2014 21:32:37 -0400 Received: from mho-03-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.66]:10310 "EHLO mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751372AbaHRBcg (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Aug 2014 21:32:36 -0400 X-Mail-Handler: Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn X-Originating-IP: 96.249.243.124 X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@dyndns.com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX18mbGtZxesb6Q8y7uf6rm23Ql4olID3N54= X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.0.1 titan 1A21C5C838D Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2014 21:32:24 -0400 From: Jason Cooper To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: Stephen Boyd , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] irqchip: gic: Allow gic_arch_extn hooks to call into scheduler Message-ID: <20140818013224.GM12769@titan.lakedaemon.net> References: <1407938238-21413-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> <20140817173236.GG12769@titan.lakedaemon.net> <20140817185522.GX30401@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20140817190434.GJ12769@titan.lakedaemon.net> <20140817214123.GY30401@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140817214123.GY30401@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 10:41:23PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 03:04:34PM -0400, Jason Cooper wrote: > > Quoting Nico: > > > > "Of course it would be good to clarify things wrt Russell's remark > > independently from this patch." > > > > I took 'independently' to mean "This patch is ok, *and* we need to > > address Russell's concerns in a follow-up patch." > > > > Nico's Reviewed-by with that comment was sent August 13th. The most > > recent activity on this thread was also August 13th. After four days, I > > reasoned there were no objections to his comment. > > Right, during the merge window, and during merge windows, I tend to > ignore almost all email now because people don't stop developing, and > they don't take any notice where the mainline cycle is. In fact, I go > off and do non-kernel work during a merge window and only briefly scan > for bug fixes. Ok, now dropped. thx, Jason.