From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751787AbaHUPVl (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Aug 2014 11:21:41 -0400 Received: from gw-1.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.217]:56720 "EHLO pandora.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751680AbaHUPVi (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Aug 2014 11:21:38 -0400 Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 16:21:23 +0100 From: Russell King - ARM Linux To: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: LKML , Catalin Iacob , Dave Jones , Ingo Molnar , Kevin Hilman , "Paul E. McKenney" , Peter Zijlstra , Stephen Boyd , Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 6/9] arm: Tell irq work about self IPI support Message-ID: <20140821152122.GL30401@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1408632777-3348-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> <1408632777-3348-7-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1408632777-3348-7-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 04:52:54PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > ARM irq work IPI support depends on SMP support. That information is > partly known at early boottime. Lets implement > arch_irq_work_has_own_interrupt() accordingly. Sorry, this makes no sense on its own. As there's no context for this to know whether it's an appropriate change or not, it would be irresponsible fo me to provide an ack for something I don't understand. -- FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.5Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net.