From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753195AbaHXTEM (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Aug 2014 15:04:12 -0400 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:48368 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752435AbaHXTEL (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Aug 2014 15:04:11 -0400 Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2014 12:04:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20140824.120408.894996451904247807.davem@davemloft.net> To: torvalds@linux-foundation.org Cc: Knut_Petersen@t-online.de, tianyu.lan@intel.com, rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, trenn@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Bug 3.14.17] inconsistent lock state From: David Miller In-Reply-To: References: <53F9CC77.70009@t-online.de> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.5 on Emacs 24.1 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.7 (shards.monkeyblade.net [149.20.54.216]); Sun, 24 Aug 2014 12:04:10 -0700 (PDT) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Linus Torvalds Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2014 11:49:31 -0700 > On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Linus Torvalds > wrote: >> On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 4:28 AM, Knut Petersen >> wrote: >>> >>> Since months the postmaster wantonly blocks all mail traffic from the >>> biggest german ISP t-online.de to all vger.kernel.org mailing lists, >>> therefore I could not cc lkml. >> >> Hmm. > > Looks like t-online used to have serious spam problems, with lots of > bad users etc. > > Judging by googling, that _seems_ to have been fixed, and maybe vger > should unblock it again. Davem? It's not that they are a source of SPAM, but rather their problem is their content filter, about %30 of lkml postings get bounced back to postmaster. I really don't want t-online accounts subscribing to the mailing lists, there are many alternative email services people could use instead.