mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 3/5] lib/bug: Use RCU list ops for module_bug_list
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 10:55:41 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140825105541.21089.19536.stgit@kbuild-fedora.novalocal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140825105520.21089.26870.stgit@kbuild-fedora.novalocal>

Actually since module_bug_list should be used in BUG context,
we may not need this. But for someone who want to use this
from normal context, this makes module_bug_list an RCU list.

Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
---
 kernel/module.c |    5 +++--
 lib/bug.c       |   20 ++++++++++++++------
 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/module.c b/kernel/module.c
index 84b068d..3bd0dc9 100644
--- a/kernel/module.c
+++ b/kernel/module.c
@@ -1848,9 +1848,10 @@ static void free_module(struct module *mod)
 	mutex_lock(&module_mutex);
 	/* Unlink carefully: kallsyms could be walking list. */
 	list_del_rcu(&mod->list);
-	/* Wait for RCU synchronizing before releasing mod->list. */
-	synchronize_rcu();
+	/* Remove this module from bug list, this uses list_del_rcu */
 	module_bug_cleanup(mod);
+	/* Wait for RCU synchronizing before releasing mod->list and buglist. */
+	synchronize_rcu();
 	mutex_unlock(&module_mutex);
 
 	/* This may be NULL, but that's OK */
diff --git a/lib/bug.c b/lib/bug.c
index d1d7c78..0c3bd95 100644
--- a/lib/bug.c
+++ b/lib/bug.c
@@ -64,16 +64,22 @@ static LIST_HEAD(module_bug_list);
 static const struct bug_entry *module_find_bug(unsigned long bugaddr)
 {
 	struct module *mod;
+	const struct bug_entry *bug = NULL;
 
-	list_for_each_entry(mod, &module_bug_list, bug_list) {
-		const struct bug_entry *bug = mod->bug_table;
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	list_for_each_entry_rcu(mod, &module_bug_list, bug_list) {
 		unsigned i;
 
+		bug = mod->bug_table;
 		for (i = 0; i < mod->num_bugs; ++i, ++bug)
 			if (bugaddr == bug_addr(bug))
-				return bug;
+				goto out;
 	}
-	return NULL;
+	bug = NULL;
+out:
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+
+	return bug;
 }
 
 void module_bug_finalize(const Elf_Ehdr *hdr, const Elf_Shdr *sechdrs,
@@ -99,13 +105,15 @@ void module_bug_finalize(const Elf_Ehdr *hdr, const Elf_Shdr *sechdrs,
 	 * Strictly speaking this should have a spinlock to protect against
 	 * traversals, but since we only traverse on BUG()s, a spinlock
 	 * could potentially lead to deadlock and thus be counter-productive.
+	 * Thus, this uses RCU to safely manipulate the bug list, since BUG
+	 * must run in non-interruptive state.
 	 */
-	list_add(&mod->bug_list, &module_bug_list);
+	list_add_rcu(&mod->bug_list, &module_bug_list);
 }
 
 void module_bug_cleanup(struct module *mod)
 {
-	list_del(&mod->bug_list);
+	list_del_rcu(&mod->bug_list);
 }
 
 #else



  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-08-25 10:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-25 10:55 [RFC PATCH 0/5] module: Remove stop_machine from module unloading Masami Hiramatsu
2014-08-25 10:55 ` [RFC PATCH 1/5] module: Wait for RCU synchronizing before releasing a module Masami Hiramatsu
2014-08-25 10:55 ` [RFC PATCH 2/5] module: Unlink module with RCU synchronizing instead of stop_machine Masami Hiramatsu
2014-08-25 10:55 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2014-08-25 10:55 ` [RFC PATCH 4/5] module: Lock up a module when loading with a LOCLUP flag Masami Hiramatsu
2014-08-26  5:30   ` Lucas De Marchi
2014-08-26  9:26     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-08-26 12:04       ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] kmod: Support lockup option to make module un-removable Masami Hiramatsu
2014-08-26 12:04         ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] libkmod: support lockup module option Masami Hiramatsu
2014-08-26 12:04         ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] modprobe: Add --lockup option to make module unremovable Masami Hiramatsu
2014-09-01 22:17         ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] kmod: Support lockup option to make module un-removable Lucas De Marchi
2014-10-13  4:41           ` Rusty Russell
2014-08-25 10:55 ` [RFC PATCH 5/5] module: Remove stop_machine from module unloading Masami Hiramatsu
2014-10-13  4:40   ` Rusty Russell
2014-10-21 10:34     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-10-22  4:25       ` Rusty Russell
2014-10-21 11:27     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-09-03  3:11 ` [RFC PATCH 0/5] " Masami Hiramatsu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140825105541.21089.19536.stgit@kbuild-fedora.novalocal \
    --to=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®