From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932761AbaHYOM0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Aug 2014 10:12:26 -0400 Received: from mail-qa0-f44.google.com ([209.85.216.44]:35892 "EHLO mail-qa0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932233AbaHYOMY (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Aug 2014 10:12:24 -0400 Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 10:12:20 -0400 From: Tejun Heo To: Dongsheng Yang Cc: lizefan@huawei.com, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] cgroup: Introduce cgroup_detach_task(). Message-ID: <20140825141220.GA31066@mtj.dyndns.org> References: <1408966330-2374-1-git-send-email-yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1408966330-2374-1-git-send-email-yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 07:32:10PM +0800, Dongsheng Yang wrote: > Currently, the only method to detach a task from a cgroup is moving > it to others. It looks not natrual to me. Ummm... how is this different from moving it to the root cgroup? "just because" usually isn't a good enough rationale. Thanks. -- tejun