From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933311AbaHYTDf (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Aug 2014 15:03:35 -0400 Received: from 251.110.2.81.in-addr.arpa ([81.2.110.251]:33267 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751799AbaHYTDe (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Aug 2014 15:03:34 -0400 Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 20:02:15 +0100 From: One Thousand Gnomes To: Randy Dunlap Cc: Fejes =?UTF-8?B?SsOzenNlZg==?= , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-stable@vger.kernel.org, "David E. Box" Subject: Re: Problem with commit: x86, iosf: Make IOSF driver modular and usable by more drivers Message-ID: <20140825200215.6c0e900f@alan.etchedpixels.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <53F8D1FE.5050205@infradead.org> References: <53F8D1FE.5050205@infradead.org> Organization: Intel Corporation X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.23; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > David, any other suggestions? > Why can't the users of IOSF_MBI just select it? That's what many other > drivers do when they need to be sure that some functionality is present. I think the obvious problem is that most users of IOSF_MBI are non-obvious and there will be many of them over time. > > I'm surprised that someone else (e.g. Linus) has not complained about the > 'default m' for this driver. That's certainly wrong, but drivers that use it should probably auto-select it or we will get a billion bug reports asking why graphics doesn't work etc Alan