From: "Petr Mládek" <pmladek@suse.cz>
To: Patrick Palka <patrick@parcs.ath.cx>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
jack@suse.cz, rostedt@goodmis.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix faulty logic in the case of recursive printk
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 11:19:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140826091941.GA2360@dhcp128.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1408896096-16605-1-git-send-email-patrick@parcs.ath.cx>
On Sun 24-08-14 12:01:36, Patrick Palka wrote:
> We shouldn't set text_len in the code path that detects printk recursion
> because text_len corresponds to the length of the string inside textbuf.
> A few lines down from the line
>
> text_len = strlen(recursion_msg);
>
> is the line
>
> text_len += vscnprintf(text + text_len, ...);
>
> So if printk detects recursion, it sets text_len to 29 and logs an
> error. Then the message supplied by the caller of printk is stored
> inside textbuf but offset by 29 bytes. This means that the output of
> the recursive call to printk will contain 29 bytes of garbage in front
> of it.
>
> This defect is caused by commit 458df9fd ("printk: remove separate
> printk_sched buffers and use printk buf instead") which turned
>
> text_len = vscnprintf(text + text_len, ...);
>
> into
>
> text_len += vscnprintf(text + text_len, ...);
>
> To fix this, this patch avoids setting text_len when logging the printk
> recursion error. This patch also performs a couple of local
> micro-optimizations (use unlikely() and ARRAY_SIZE()).
Great catch! And I agree with Jack about that strlen.
> Signed-off-by: Patrick Palka <patrick@parcs.ath.cx>
> ---
> kernel/printk/printk.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk.c b/kernel/printk/printk.c
> index e04c455..c101ec2 100644
> --- a/kernel/printk/printk.c
> +++ b/kernel/printk/printk.c
> @@ -1665,15 +1665,15 @@ asmlinkage int vprintk_emit(int facility, int level,
> raw_spin_lock(&logbuf_lock);
> logbuf_cpu = this_cpu;
>
> - if (recursion_bug) {
> + if (unlikely(recursion_bug)) {
> static const char recursion_msg[] =
> "BUG: recent printk recursion!";
>
> recursion_bug = 0;
> - text_len = strlen(recursion_msg);
> /* emit KERN_CRIT message */
> printed_len += log_store(0, 2, LOG_PREFIX|LOG_NEWLINE, 0,
> - NULL, 0, recursion_msg, text_len);
> + NULL, 0, recursion_msg,
> + ARRAY_SIZE(recursion_msg) - 1);
> }
>
> /*
> --
> 2.1.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-26 9:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-24 16:01 Patrick Palka
2014-08-26 8:48 ` Jan Kara
2014-08-26 11:23 ` Patrick Palka
2014-08-26 12:56 ` Jan Kara
2014-08-27 7:36 ` Petr Mládek
2014-08-26 9:19 ` Petr Mládek [this message]
2014-08-26 13:53 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140826091941.GA2360@dhcp128.suse.cz \
--to=pmladek@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patrick@parcs.ath.cx \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®