From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755037AbaHZSNi (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Aug 2014 14:13:38 -0400 Received: from mail-qa0-f42.google.com ([209.85.216.42]:58598 "EHLO mail-qa0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754488AbaHZSNh (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Aug 2014 14:13:37 -0400 Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 14:13:32 -0400 From: Tejun Heo To: Christoph Lameter Cc: akpm@linuxfoundation.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [PATCH 23/35] [PATCH 23/36] s390: cio driver &__get_cpu_var replacements Message-ID: <20140826181332.GG31659@mtj.dyndns.org> References: <20140817173023.439660246@linux.com> <20140817173036.491289559@linux.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140817173036.491289559@linux.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 12:30:46PM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote: > Use this_cpu_ptr() instead of &__get_cpu_var() > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter (Please disregard the ones I posted for v1 of the patch series) Applied to percpu/for-3.18-consistent-ops. Please let me know if this patch should be routed differently. Note that this patch was to be applied to percpu/for-3.17 but delayed due to build issues caused by cpumask_var_t. Thanks. -- tejun