From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935957AbaH0Va6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Aug 2014 17:30:58 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:57358 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932146AbaH0Va4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Aug 2014 17:30:56 -0400 Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 14:30:55 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Christoph Lameter Cc: Matthew Wilcox , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, willy@linux.intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 00/21] Support ext4 on NV-DIMMs Message-Id: <20140827143055.5210c5fb9696e460b456eb26@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20140827130613.c8f6790093d279a447196f17@linux-foundation.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.2.0beta5 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 27 Aug 2014 16:22:20 -0500 (CDT) Christoph Lameter wrote: > > Some explanation of why one would use ext4 instead of, say, > > suitably-modified ramfs/tmpfs/rd/etc? > > The NVDIMM contents survive reboot and therefore ramfs and friends wont > work with it. See "suitably modified". Presumably this type of memory would need to come from a particular page allocator zone. ramfs would be unweildy due to its use to dentry/inode caches, but rd/etc should be feasible. I dunno, I'm not proposing implementations - I'm asking obvious questions. Stuff which should have been addressed in the changelogs before one even starts to read the code...