From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753152AbaH2MAL (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Aug 2014 08:00:11 -0400 Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk ([106.187.55.193]:39464 "EHLO mezzanine.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753078AbaH2MAG (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Aug 2014 08:00:06 -0400 Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 12:59:43 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Mark Rutland Cc: Xiubo Li , "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" , "nicoleotsuka@gmail.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" Message-ID: <20140829115943.GV29327@sirena.org.uk> References: <20140829110601.GB21473@leverpostej> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="s0H35NU0PUc8VBh+" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140829110601.GB21473@leverpostej> X-Cookie: Simulated picture. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 94.175.94.161 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] ASoC: fsl-sai: using 'lsb-first' property instead of 'big-endian-data'. X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mezzanine.sirena.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --s0H35NU0PUc8VBh+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 12:06:01PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 08:12:12AM +0100, Xiubo Li wrote: > > The 'big-endian-data' property is originally used to indicate whether the > > LSB firstly or MSB firstly will be transmitted to the CODEC or received > > from the CODEC, and there has nothing relation to the memory data. > Both Nicolin [1] and Mark [2] asked for the old property to be kept > around for compatibility reasons. Those requests seem to have been > ignored entirely; the commit message doesn't even describe why you > believe removing support for the old property is safe. The response was that the relevant chips aren't out in the wild so it's vanishingly unlikely that anyone would have a real DT with this option enabled. I'll defer to Nicolin on if that's the case or not. --s0H35NU0PUc8VBh+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUAGssAAoJELSic+t+oim9TNYQAJwN380ACjc82CC/8I5V25OZ i1VqXY0W+SHBnFx1ENACiHFAZS/IsiCd+n2h0yFlPrGfDGqxU+zZ/W+m364CJYSF psd+Udnyx8TI1MPq9cbWyvWCCIS4CGjRmySNfk1l8u7YYUcR/+Z7QU2NHNzyyvcg 0vpvs7Ycqhp0WUIfMh4u7n3/2bCEBzgWPrbkGgpx3hgQ+9X/isFGKQQfFX/9jtn3 eigxkQ9B5eqNJjk5wa+tOaOYy66Us/8u8yXCe9T4i9UzgkRjjPY62rpoSe0HyREa 1ui7fydT/Olg6KLaaJqsOsKzUSkLKt8XSDCyQYigHf/s3ja3nwB+ku+A5LwStFSc pJiPmh5S48ODao1fn3KXxdAYObYNPpFFYb5LEn6yDzT/VZMrmvfkVR/sMZewMsDb MtuY/32fdVm/5Hk9UJsWVYx0lL/YyrOAKw718oHKcq8ZX8shaeTWp7rzyQz3DY13 RFtfeuu2HKtrfuFgNbGYbmWMb4iujpydGaCjNjrPIaAd45XdDmZOLG8gWUVJc4n4 uz2AmMd3C2IzBm6As6uns68VqeF0W7jczQX5Pd69HosVmgopCQwOlJl/o8QYst7R XuQBGkhiWSxW3XUiu74Q98QUanthoaDEyk4CYD9WFNtBq+jNzACkbz/vtEzjDRJ1 PIgIV6U2vyS+ZTanKfXT =CMuk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --s0H35NU0PUc8VBh+--