From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754536AbaIAQ7q (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Sep 2014 12:59:46 -0400 Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk ([106.187.55.193]:45092 "EHLO mezzanine.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751195AbaIAQ7o (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Sep 2014 12:59:44 -0400 Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2014 17:58:53 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Catalin Marinas Cc: Graeme Gregory , Arnd Bergmann , "linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org" , Rob Herring , Randy Dunlap , Robert Richter , Jason Cooper , "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" , Marc Zyngier , Daniel Lezcano , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Robert Moore , Will Deacon , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Olof Johansson , Liviu Dudau , Bjorn Helgaas , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Lv Zheng Message-ID: <20140901165853.GJ29327@sirena.org.uk> References: <1409583961-7466-1-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> <1409583961-7466-2-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> <2861461.8zNpLC3I2n@wuerfel> <20140901152854.GJ2953@xora-haswell.xora.org.uk> <20140901165333.GE608@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vFj1JTFBn4Zx1dEI" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140901165333.GE608@arm.com> X-Cookie: Simulated picture. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 94.175.94.161 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: [Linaro-acpi] [RFC PATCH for Juno 1/2] net: smsc911x add support for probing from ACPI X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mezzanine.sirena.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --vFj1JTFBn4Zx1dEI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 05:53:33PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: > Confused. Then how come smsc911x_drv_probe() has this line: > acpi_handle *ahandle = ACPI_HANDLE(&pdev->dev); > without any #ifdef's. There's a stub smsc911x_probe_config_acpi() provided in the non-ACPI case, Arnd's suggestion is basically to remove the stub. --vFj1JTFBn4Zx1dEI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUBKXKAAoJELSic+t+oim9w4YQAJgqBp4ZZK1g0TnNamLLxEmY tEkKtzlmTTWl3YWpa+1OLjpm1LXQIM7Ysnaev90/1OiTLM4huPEjG/jwBZ//siyY c90Js4fL9BtBXhSc1Zp6ua+DbYp7b2/iyCMWR202jykgYtRJz6OiS+rHXzXRKaPo PzUol1WD69SonUAcEaRsOPDrvbQUytSx6P//cVYy811iRAboCSiIMHBwBmcREslc AobrG7FCJENHGXZzJAeSi59xwbgGPY1m0Zaim8CXwoGT9EhAMXcj6VO1Ie5l9ohv hp+ocZlmcTX4FpUrfBL9lpOZwNSbErj2OqhjmsHNdgJrW7anTuJ7V9VnntD4BYti /eRd0dcJl+t1MyBxeiAz2k2uJXo6LB8gTH5n9fbUYZKmVS50AB8O+PMti2UYao4S wzzPtDdZ+AiHxwMjpDvCsP88Oz3mX1WVvAb3/K+xsGjkWP4pF/fcdNmL0+wauHL1 MieKpFz0l83BGCLYfC662q+n13oPbd3eBFTXdWEM1fVpHPQ4CFR4pY4oWiZ4HsIb 4oW2c4nTB78teMS3vHfbO/y/r7EWE1Ig7FjVvdFnhMm/76iqmTFfWpkrm6pKZ15U GQEZPWj/T61Ryq8vpnRvI3NU/7AW6MaPvSHZPqEe/wP/HqR2ExR0NtSO7A8315Ot 7PhCFNqUOVJ5RgUzwmeC =wNA1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --vFj1JTFBn4Zx1dEI--