From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753503AbaIEWbv (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Fri, 5 Sep 2014 18:31:51 -0400
Received: from mail-pd0-f174.google.com ([209.85.192.174]:42381 "EHLO
	mail-pd0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751237AbaIEWbs (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 5 Sep 2014 18:31:48 -0400
Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2014 07:31:39 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Wu Zhangjin <falcon@meizu.com>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>,
        Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, hare@suse.com,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>,
        Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@canonical.com>,
        Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@suse.de>,
        Santosh Rastapur <santosh@chelsio.com>, Kay Sievers <kay@vrfy.org>,
        One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
        Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@canonical.com>,
        Pierre Fersing <pierre-fersing@pierref.org>,
        Nagalakshmi Nandigama <nagalakshmi.nandigama@avagotech.com>,
        Praveen Krishnamoorthy <praveen.krishnamoorthy@avagotech.com>,
        Sreekanth Reddy <sreekanth.reddy@avagotech.com>,
        Abhijit Mahajan <abhijit.mahajan@avagotech.com>,
        Casey Leedom <leedom@chelsio.com>,
        Hariprasad S <hariprasad@chelsio.com>,
        MPT-FusionLinux.pdl@avagotech.com,
        Linux SCSI List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
        "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 3/6] kthread: warn on kill signal if not OOM
Message-ID: <20140905223139.GB15723@mtj.dyndns.org>
References: <1409899047-13045-1-git-send-email-mcgrof@do-not-panic.com>
 <CAB=NE6Wti1RpAFk5q_YeZn2F9Rd=wsiwhyPszu74nG9fXwH5vQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20140905141241.GC10455@mtj.dyndns.org>
 <20140905164405.GA28964@core.coreip.homeip.net>
 <20140905174925.GA12991@mtj.dyndns.org>
 <20140905181003.GA29003@core.coreip.homeip.net>
 <20140905222956.GA15723@mtj.dyndns.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20140905222956.GA15723@mtj.dyndns.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Sat, Sep 06, 2014 at 07:29:56AM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> It is for storage devices which always have guaranteed synchronous
> probing on module load and well-defined probing order.  Sure, modern
> setups are a lot more dynamic but I'm quite certain that there are
> setups in the wild which depend on storage driver loading being
> synchronous.  We can't simply declare one day that such behavior is
> broken and break, most likely, their boots.

To add a bit, if the argument here is that dependency on such behavior
shouldn't exist and module loading and device probing should always be
asynchronous, the right approach is implementing "synchronous_probing"
flag not the other way around.  I actually wouldn't hate to see that
change happening but whoever submits and routes such a change should
be ready for a major shitstorm, I'm afraid.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun